2004
DOI: 10.1162/0033553042476189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Impacts of New Unionization on Private Sector Employers: 1984-2001

Abstract: Economic impacts of unionization on employers are difficult to estimate in the absence of large, representative data on establishments with union status information. Estimates are also confounded by selection bias, because unions could organize at highly profitable enterprises that are more likely to grow and pay higher wages. Using multiple establishment-level data sets that represent establishments that faced organizing drives in the United States during 1984 -1999, this paper uses a regression discontinuity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
314
3
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
17
314
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that during 1984 to 2001, newly-organized firms in the United States did not pay any wage premium nor suffer any deleterious effects on employment. DiNardo and Lee (2004) explain the discrepancy with other studies showing the persistence of some level of union wage premium by hypothesizing that any union wage premium that in fact remains is a product of union gains made in the period prior to the 1980s, and that these gains will slowly diminish as 'newly-organized' firms that pay no union wage premium are averaged into the mix and as the wages in 'long-established' union firms diminish relative to non-union firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result suggests that during 1984 to 2001, newly-organized firms in the United States did not pay any wage premium nor suffer any deleterious effects on employment. DiNardo and Lee (2004) explain the discrepancy with other studies showing the persistence of some level of union wage premium by hypothesizing that any union wage premium that in fact remains is a product of union gains made in the period prior to the 1980s, and that these gains will slowly diminish as 'newly-organized' firms that pay no union wage premium are averaged into the mix and as the wages in 'long-established' union firms diminish relative to non-union firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Using a somewhat different specification than the previous studies, Blackburn (2008) One interesting study, also conducted in the United States, used data covering the period from 1984 to 2001 (DiNardo andLee, 2004). These researchers examined data from newly-organized firms in order to determine the impact of unionization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings are similar if these four firms are excluded from the sample. For the remaining companies in the subsample, I then consult NLRB elections and petitions from 2001-2007 (limiting the search to elections with twenty workers or more, following Dinardo and Lee 2004). For two firms, this data yields union information and hence union categorization.…”
Section: Union Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freeman and Kleiner (1990) find very modest wage increases among newly unionized firms in the 1980s that they sampled, relative to similar nonunion firms. Dinardo and Lee (2004) estimate the effect of unionization on business survival, employment, output, productivity, and wages using a regression discontinuity framework. Local to the 50% election vote discontinuity, they find that private sector unions have little effect on these outcome measures.…”
Section: Michael F Lovenheim Siepr Stanford Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%