2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00299-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic impact of tuberculosis mortality in 120 countries and the cost of not achieving the Sustainable Development Goals tuberculosis targets: a full-income analysis

Abstract: Background The tuberculosis targets for the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for a 90% reduction in tuberculosis deaths by 2030, compared with 2015, but meeting this target now seems highly improbable. To assess the economic impact of not meeting the target until 2045, we estimated full-income losses in 120 countries, including those due to excess deaths resulting from COVID-19-related disruptions to tuberculosis services, for the period 2020–50. Methods Ann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
38
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…À l'exception de l'infection par le VIH, ces facteurs ne sont pas encore pris en compte de manière exhaustive par les programmes de santé publique dans les pays à ressources limitées [27] . Enfin, les aspects socio-économiques restent primordiaux [28] : maladie de la pauvreté par essence, la tuberculose peut aussi générer de la pauvreté en raison de la perte de revenus, ou du fait de coûts catastrophiques pour la famille, donnant lieu à un cercle vicieux « tuberculose-pauvreté » que les stratégies biomédicales ne peuvent à elles seules briser [26] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…À l'exception de l'infection par le VIH, ces facteurs ne sont pas encore pris en compte de manière exhaustive par les programmes de santé publique dans les pays à ressources limitées [27] . Enfin, les aspects socio-économiques restent primordiaux [28] : maladie de la pauvreté par essence, la tuberculose peut aussi générer de la pauvreté en raison de la perte de revenus, ou du fait de coûts catastrophiques pour la famille, donnant lieu à un cercle vicieux « tuberculose-pauvreté » que les stratégies biomédicales ne peuvent à elles seules briser [26] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…An estimated 1.5-million people died from tuberculosis (TB) disease in 2020, and TB is on course to retake its position as the largest cause of death by a single infectious agent [1]. Fuelled by ongoing transmission through exhaled or expectorated Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) bacteria, TB incidence is declining at a rate of 1-2% per annum, which is too slow given the risk and scale of mortality [1,2], lifelong impairment [3,4], poverty [5] and macro-economic consequences [6]. Problematically, most Mtb transmission in high incidence settings remains unaccounted for [3], with less than one-in-ten occurrences of TB explained by transmission from a known contact [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of not meeting the End TB Targets by 2030 and facing the excess deaths resulting from COVID-19-related disruptions to TB services may translate into 31•8 million TB deaths globally corresponding to an economic loss of $17•5 trillion between 2020 and 2050. 3 Developing new safe, affordable, and effective TB vaccines is critical for achieving these targets. While promising candidates exist (for example, the M72/AS01E candidate vaccine 4 ), limited market incentives to invest in TB prevention has delayed the development of novel TB vaccines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%