Economic impact of clinical decision support interventions based on electronic health records

Abstract

Background Unnecessary healthcare utilization, non-adherence to current clinical guidelines, or insufficient personalized care are perpetual challenges and remain potential major cost-drivers for healthcare systems around the world. Implementing decision support systems into clinical care is promised to improve quality of care and thereby yield substantial effects on reducing healthcare expenditure. In this article, we evaluate the economic impact of clinical decision support (CDS) interventions based on electronic health records (EHR). Methods We searched for studies published after 2014 using MEDLINE, CENTRAL, WEB OF SCIENCE, EBSCO, and TUFTS CEA registry databases that encompass an economic evaluation or consider cost outcome measures of EHR based CDS interventions. Thereupon, we identified best practice application areas and categorized the investigated interventions according to an existing taxonomy of front-end CDS tools. Results and discussion Twenty-seven studies are investigated in this review. Of those, twenty-two studies indicate a reduction of healthcare expenditure after implementing an EHR based CDS system, especially towards prevalent application areas, such as unnecessary laboratory testing, duplicate order entry, efficient transfusion practice, or reduction of antibiotic prescriptions. On the contrary, order facilitators and undiscovered malfunctions revealed to be threats and could lead to new cost drivers in healthcare. While high upfront and maintenance costs of CDS systems are a worldwide implementation barrier, most studies do not consider implementation cost. Finally, four included economic evaluation studies report mixed monetary outcome results and thus highlight the importance of further high-quality economic evaluations for these CDS systems. Conclusion Current research studies lack consideration of comparative cost-outcome metrics as well as detailed cost components in their analyses. Nonetheless, the positive economic impact of EHR based CDS interventions is highly promising, especially with regard to reducing waste in healthcare.

Artificial Intelligence for AKI!Now: Let’s Not Await Plato’s Utopian Republic

“…37 Implementing such strategies along the continuum of AKI-related AI resources such as risk stratification and prediction, alerts, decision support, and long-term follow-up could substantially improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of AKI on the healthcare system. 38 Collaborative opportunities exist throughout the clinical healthcare systems -both within and between adult and pediatric centers -as well through partnerships with industry to make steady progress along these lines. The likelihood of finding a "one size fits all" approach is low, and we think we should attempt one best tool for each one of these tasks: Whether AI based or not, each tool must be designed for its own purpose and rigorously tested for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.…”

Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015–2018

“…For example, by using data from electronic health records, patient reminder letters can be generated and personalized with each patient’s name and address, preferred language, the name of the patient’s primary care provider, and their history of CRC screening (eg, type and time of most recent test). Although it takes resources to program electronic health records and to set up these strategies initially, clinic health information technology and automated calling and texting systems can support implementation ( 27 , 28 ). Whether clinics can maintain these interventions solely with their own resources after CRCCP technical and financial support has ended remains to be seen.…”

Going digital: opportunities and barriers in the use of technology for health research

“…Evidence has shown that electronic decision support systems (EDSS), especially in primary health care settings, can lead to better quality care as well lower health costs. 37,38 Researchers at The George Institute for Global Health developed its first EDSS platform in 2011. It provides clinical decision support tools for chronic disease management and prevention in primary health care services.…”