2015
DOI: 10.13189/aeb.2015.030101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Governance and Economic Growth in South and East Asia & Pacific Region: Evidence from Systematic Literature Reviews and Meta-analysis

Abstract: With economists and policy makers recognising the role of governance for growth, recent research focus is on governance and its impact on growth. However, with ever growing number of studies using different methodologies, data sources and country groupings, a high amount of heterogeneity is created among reported results. This has left both policy makers and researchers having different views on the importance of governance for growth. This paper has meta-synthesised the empirical evidence on governance and gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our search for this study involved a systematic review of studies of professional doctorates. Similar to earlier studies on meta-analysis by Yerrabati and Hawkes (2014, the review stages used in this study were informed by the guidelines set by three sources: Campbell and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines on systematic reviews in health care and social policy (Higgins and Green, 2011); Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD, 2009); and Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre, 2010) at UCL Institute of Education.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our search for this study involved a systematic review of studies of professional doctorates. Similar to earlier studies on meta-analysis by Yerrabati and Hawkes (2014, the review stages used in this study were informed by the guidelines set by three sources: Campbell and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines on systematic reviews in health care and social policy (Higgins and Green, 2011); Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD, 2009); and Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre, 2010) at UCL Institute of Education.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; government effectiveness and regulation quality (which measure economic governance); corruption-control and the rule of law (which captures institutional governance). These indicators have been widely used in governance empirical studies in the past ten years (see for example Gani, 2011;Andrés et al, 2015;Yerrabati and Hawkes, 2015;Ajide and Raheem, 2016a, b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, the article adopts the governance indicators from Kaufmann, Kraay, and Mastruzzi 2010, consistent with a recent stream of literature on unbundling (Andrés and Asongu 2013;Andrés, Asongu, and Amavilah 2015;Gani 2011;Nwokora and Pelizzo 2017;Oluwatobi et al 2015;Nwokora 2016, 2018;Pelizzo et al 2016;yerrabati and Hawkes 2015) and bundling (Asongu 2016;Nwachukwu 2016c, 2017c) governance dynamics.…”
Section: Clarification Of Governancementioning
confidence: 83%