Economic freedom and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of broad cultural dimensions, as well as those of religion and legal origin, on countries’ economic freedom, i.e., trade freedom, investment freedom, business freedom, labor freedom, monetary freedom, as well as a composite measure of economic freedom. Design/methodology/approach Linear regression of publicly available data regarding economic freedom (Miller et al., 2018) on cultural dimensions (Hofstede, 2009), legal origin and religion (LaPorta et al., 1999) for 52 countries was performed to determine the impact of these factors on economic freedom. Findings Results indicated femininity was the cultural dimension associated with the most measures of economic freedom. Short-term-oriented cultures were predictive of greater business freedom, while more restrained cultures were associated with greater business and monetary freedoms. Higher individualism was predictive of greater monetary freedom. Catholicism positively predicted investment freedom and negatively predicted business freedom. French civil law negatively predicted labor freedom, while socialist legal origins positively predicted trade freedom, but negatively predicted business freedom. Originality/value This is the first study to examine the impacts of culture, law and religion on economic freedom. One practical implication of this research is that countries would be wise to emphasize more feminine aspects in their cultures, as these are associated with greater economic freedom. Even minor adjustments that move in the direction of cooperation and fair processes might help increase economic freedoms and the many benefits that stem from such freedoms.

Relação entre as Dimensões Culturais dos Países e o Risco das Instituições Bancárias

“…Por outro lado, nas sociedades com maior tolerância a incertezas, os indivíduos são mais flexíveis em relação às regras, normas e códigos de comportamento e se sentem mais confortáveis em assumir riscos (DeBode et. al, 2019) e com resultados imprevisíveis (Boubakri et.…”

A Influência Das Dimensões Culturais Na Concentração Bancária Dos Países

“…Já em sociedades coletivistas a identidade e as responsabilidades dos indivíduos são atribuídas de acordo com sua participação em um grupo, esperando que os indivíduos subordinem os seus interesses e prefiram os interesses do grupo. (DeBode et al, 2019).…”

“…Algumas sociedades tendem a serem avessas às incertezas, evitando empreendimentos ambiciosos, aderindo fortemente às regulações impostas, sendo resistentes às mudanças, preferindo orientações e padrões de comportamentos claros e calculáveis ao invés de riscos desconhecidos (Kutan et al, 2020). Enquanto, nas sociedades com maior tolerância a incertezas, os indivíduos tendem a ser mais relaxados em relação aos códigos de comportamento e mais confortáveis em assumir riscos (DeBode et al 2019).…”

Culture and COVID-19-related mortality: a cross-sectional study of 50 countries

“…Indulgence means “a society that allows relatively free gratification of basic and natural human drives related to enjoying life and having fun” [ 6 ]. The opposite of indulgent cultures are restraint societies with strict social norms [ 11 ]. There, the argument is that such societies more easily accept restrictions in daily life at the expense of quality of life.…”