Economic evaluation: what does a nurse manager need to know?

Abstract

This paper considers how health economists can assist nurse managers, using the concepts and tools of economic evaluation. We aim to clarify these and also explode some of the myths about economic evaluation and its role in health care decision-making. Economic evaluation techniques compare alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. There are four principal methods; cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and cost-benefit analysis, all of which synthesize costs and outcomes, at different levels of outcome. Economic evaluation is an intrinsic part of national decision-making about the efficient provision of effective treatments and services, and increasingly, organizational matters. In the UK, such technology evaluation is disseminated in guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness (NICE), having a top-down impact on the nurse manager. But economic evaluation is increasingly relevant to the nurse manager at local level, through newer techniques such as Programme Budgeting Marginal Analysis (PBMA), which facilitates explicit, transparent decisions, from the bottom-up. Nurse managers need to weigh up competing demands on resources and decide in ways which maximize health gain. Economic evaluation can help here because it presents evidence to challenge or support existing allocations, and provides a systematic framework to analyse health care decisions. In the current context of competition for scarce resources, we suggest that nurse managers need to embrace these techniques, or be marginalized from the resource allocation process.

Patient rehabilitation in hospitals a prioritized discipline after hospital reform: a Norwegian perspective

“…The latter are privately owned, even although they are financed through the national health insurance. Surveys done after the AGF system was introduced suggest that the health authority has an increased focus on its finances, suggesting that the health authority prioritizes income (treatment quantity) over the health needs of the patients (treatment quality), a conclusion alluded to also by others (Douglas & Normand 2005).…”

Contemporary health care economics: an overview

“…Selected outcomes often provide a narrow view, focusing on one condition or specific care pathway, and limiting the use of CEA to guide allocation of resources across different health programs. 7 Karinen and colleagues assessed the cost-effectiveness of nimodipine administration in patients who presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent aneurysm clipping. 20 The authors used direct costs for the hospitalization, and the nonmonetary clinical outcome was measured as life years gained.…”

Editorial: Understanding of health economics among healthcare professionals

“…As healthcare professionals are becoming more involved in national policy implementation, and with current economic climate, where clinicians are charged with the responsibility of achieving more with limited resources, the knowledge of health economics will become even more important. This will enable them to be fully involved in debates about resource allocation to meet the healthcare needs of their local populations (Douglas & Normand ). As a result, the knowledge of the principles of economics and basic health economics is important for healthcare professionals at various levels of their education (Bonča & Tajnikar ).…”