2005
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic evaluation of voriconazole compared with conventional amphotericin B for the primary treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients

Abstract: Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis indicated the dominance of voriconazole because of both lower costs and greater efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown to have a better pericardial penetration compared to other drugs [17]. Further, it was also shown to be more cost effective compared to amphotericin B with a 10% lower overall treatment cost per patient [18]. Although severe hepatotoxicity is rare, this is unpredictable since there is inter-individual and intra-individual variability in voriconazole, plasma levels [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown to have a better pericardial penetration compared to other drugs [17]. Further, it was also shown to be more cost effective compared to amphotericin B with a 10% lower overall treatment cost per patient [18]. Although severe hepatotoxicity is rare, this is unpredictable since there is inter-individual and intra-individual variability in voriconazole, plasma levels [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other previous cases of Aspergillus-associated pneumopericardium were treated with conventional amphotericin B therapy with mixed outcomes and prolonged hospital courses (2)(3)(4)(5). Based on the limited available data, however, voriconazole appears to have superior pericardial penetration compared with other agents, and current treatment guidelines favor this agent in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (12)(13)(14)(15). Medical management with voriconazole in our case resulted in early symptomatic recovery in a high-risk cachectic patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent pharmacoeconomic analysis based on this randomized trial, the average costs of managing a patient receiving voriconazole were $30 664. 43 Costs for survivors were even higher (approximately $43 000). Although more than half of these costs were attributed to costs of hospitalization, drug therapy costs were substantial and would be increased further in a study of combination antifungal therapy.…”
Section: Considerations For Future Clinical Trials Of Combination Antmentioning
confidence: 99%