Economic evaluation of surgically trained assistant medical officers in performing major obstetric surgery in Mozambique

Abstract

Objective To compare the training and deployment costs and surgical productivity of surgically trained assistant medical officers (te´cnicos de cirurgia) and specialist physicians (surgeons and obstetrician/gynaecologists) in Mozambique in order to inform health human resource planning in a developing country with low availability of obstetric care and severe physician shortages. Te´cnicos de cirurgia have been previously shown to have quality of care outcomes comparable to physicians.Design Economic evaluation of costs and productivity of surgically trained assistant medical officers and specialist physicians.Setting Hospitals and health science training institutions in Mozambique.Population Surgically trained assistants, medical officers, surgeons and obstetrician/gynaecologists in Mozambique.Methods The costs of training and deploying the two cadres of health workers were derived from a review of budgets, annual expenditure reports, enrolment registers, and accounting statements from training institutions and interviews with directors and administrators. Productivity estimates were based on a hospital survey of physicians and técnicos de cirurgia. Results The 30-year cost per major obstetric surgery was $38.9 for te´cnicos de cirurgia and $144.1 for surgeons and obstetrician/ gynaecologists. Doubling the salaries of técnicos de cirurgia resulted in a smaller but still substantial difference in cost per surgery between the groups ($60.3 versus $144.1 per procedure). One-way sensitivity analysis to test the impact of varying other inputs did not substantially change the magnitude of the cost advantage of te´cnicos de cirurgia. ConclusionTraining more mid-level health workers in surgery can be part of the response to the health worker shortage, which today threatens the achievement of the health Millennium Development Goals in developing countries.

Orthopaedic Trauma Care in Haiti: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Innovative Surgical Residency Program

“…Numerous published reports have shown that abbreviated surgical training programs are successful and cost-effective interventions to expand the supply of surgical services in LMICs [27][28][29]. World Health Organization-CHOosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) has established the threshold for cost-effective programs as less than three times the gross domestic product per capita per DALY averted and the threshold for highly cost-effective programs as less than the gross domestic product per capita per DALY averted.…”

Obstetric care in low-resource settings: What, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?

“…In Mozambique, cost per major obstetric surgery for TCs was $39 versus $144 for obstetricians/gynecologists [181]. In Burkina Faso, the estimated average cost per averted newborn death for an obstetrician-led team compared with a general practitioner-led team was 11 757 international dollars (due largely to personnel availability and larger teams in urban settings), and 200 international dollars for a general practitioner-led team versus a clinical officer-led team.…”

Recasting the role of the surgeon in Uganda: a proposal to maximize the impact of surgery on public health

“…Already in some countries such as Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo, scarce specialists train nonphysicians and nurses in surgical and perioperative skills (Longombe 1997;Kruk et al 2007;Lavy et al 2007). This commentary draws on the experiences of the authors in Uganda, including a full career of surgical practice and education (SL), as well as the published and 'grey' literature, to describe how and why this 'recasting' could occur.…”