2017
DOI: 10.5958/2455-7129.2017.00004.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Evaluation of Sugarcane Based Agro forestry Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our benefit–cost ratios shown in Figure 3 were at the lower end of reported values in the literature of 1.45–2.66 for G. arborea (Bertomeu, 2006; Coomes et al., 2008; Magcale‐Macandog et al., 1999; Mali et al., 2017) but similar to the only reported benefit–cost ratio for S. parahyba that we found in the literature (Schwartz et al., 2017). The main reason for the comparatively low benefit–cost ratios of our plantation, particularly if the subsidy was subtracted, might be the short growth time of only 51 mo, whereas the comparison values from the literature originated from plantations were at least 8 yr old.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our benefit–cost ratios shown in Figure 3 were at the lower end of reported values in the literature of 1.45–2.66 for G. arborea (Bertomeu, 2006; Coomes et al., 2008; Magcale‐Macandog et al., 1999; Mali et al., 2017) but similar to the only reported benefit–cost ratio for S. parahyba that we found in the literature (Schwartz et al., 2017). The main reason for the comparatively low benefit–cost ratios of our plantation, particularly if the subsidy was subtracted, might be the short growth time of only 51 mo, whereas the comparison values from the literature originated from plantations were at least 8 yr old.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…(1999) found a benefit–cost ratio of 2.66 when G. arborea was harvested after 8 yr on small‐holder farms, either planted as blocks or hedgerows. A recent study in India reported a benefit–cost ratio of 1.6 for the harvest of a G. arborea in an agroforestry system after 12 yr of growth (Mali et al., 2017), and another study in Panama reported a benefit–cost ratio of 1.72 after 10 yr of growth (Coomes et al., 2008). For an S. parahyba enrichment plantation in a degraded Amazonian forest in the State of Pará, Brazil, Schwartz et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ở Junagadh, Ấn Độ, phần lớn các giống xoài ra hoa bị chậm lại do nhiệt độ vượt quá nhiệt độ tối ưu của chúng. Năng suất của xoài, chuối, đu đủ và hồng xiêm được phát hiện là có mối tương quan nghịch với nhiệt độ và lượng mưa trong khoảng thời gian 10 năm ở quận Navasari, Ấn Độ [5]. Trong một nghiên cứu đánh giá tác động của biến đổi khí hậu đối với sản xuất chuối toàn cầu, một số kết luận đã được rút ra; chẳng hạn như ở các khu vực có nhiệt độ trung bình ≥ 24°C, chuối sinh trưởng và phát triển thuận lợi hơn.…”
Section: Mở đầUunclassified
“…Sugarcane an important commercial crop, is globally cultivated under varied regimes of tropical and subtropical climate (Kumar et al 2022). Due to rising market of biofuels and bioenergy, the multifarious potential of the crop is now being utilized in the industrial production of ethanol and other high value products (Mali et al 2017;Iwuozor et al 2022). Sugarcane has the capability to cope with various climatic vagaries to the greater extent (Kumar and Sharma 2014; Kumar et al 2017;Dhansu et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%