2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01590-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic evaluation of pharmacy services: a systematic review of the literature (2016–2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) (Supplementary material 3) [17]. All studies were evaluated by RJ and 20% (10 papers) was independently evaluated by RL [18]. Studies were not excluded based on the MMAT results because the focus of the review was on the nature of the interventions rather than their effectiveness.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) (Supplementary material 3) [17]. All studies were evaluated by RJ and 20% (10 papers) was independently evaluated by RL [18]. Studies were not excluded based on the MMAT results because the focus of the review was on the nature of the interventions rather than their effectiveness.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%