2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.2001.00263.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic evaluation of inland fisheries in England and Wales

Abstract: Recreational inland fisheries are recognized to have considerable socio‐economic benefits, not only for individuals participating directly but also for others in both local and wider communities. In England and Wales the Environment Agency (EA) has a duty to maintain, improve and develop inland fisheries. At present, there are no recent economic evaluations of the whole range of UK inland fisheries for the EA to refer to when confronted with resource issues. There is a particular need to explore the benefits o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, fishing for Guadalupe bass, Micropterus treculii in the Edwards Plateau ecoregion, Texas, USA generates over $75 million and 776 jobs in a sparsely populated region (Thomas et al 2014). Likewise, angling for Atlantic salmon and sea trout in England and Wales attracts visitors to rural areas, supporting jobs and contributing to the local economy (Peirson et al 2001;Aprahamian et al 2010). However, game fishes make up only a small percentage of freshwater fish species and recreational fishing qualifies as a use of water resources (albeit much less exploitative than commercial fishing).…”
Section: Non-use Economic Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fishing for Guadalupe bass, Micropterus treculii in the Edwards Plateau ecoregion, Texas, USA generates over $75 million and 776 jobs in a sparsely populated region (Thomas et al 2014). Likewise, angling for Atlantic salmon and sea trout in England and Wales attracts visitors to rural areas, supporting jobs and contributing to the local economy (Peirson et al 2001;Aprahamian et al 2010). However, game fishes make up only a small percentage of freshwater fish species and recreational fishing qualifies as a use of water resources (albeit much less exploitative than commercial fishing).…”
Section: Non-use Economic Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonuse value is partitioned into option (value to an individual of maintaining the option to use a resource some time in the future), bequest (value to an individual knowing that a resource is available for future generations to use) and existence value (value derived by an individual from knowing that a resource exists and that others have the opportunity to use it) (e.g. Loomis and White 1996; Riechers and Fedler 1996; Weithman 1999; Peirson et al . 2001; Table 2).…”
Section: Description Of Inland Fisheries Of Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of WTP or WTA depends on assumptions about entitlements and whether the change is an improvement or a deterioration in environmental quality. Generally, WTA is only used where there are clear property rights to the status quo and the change is a deterioration (Peirson et al . 2001).…”
Section: Description Of Inland Fisheries Of Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, recreational inland fishing is recognized to have considerable socioeconomic benefits not only for the individuals directly participating but also for others in both the local and wider communities (Peirson et al, 2001;Arlinghaus et al, 2002;Aprahamian et al, 2010). Recreational angling may contribute significantly to a local tourism industry (Winfield and Durie, 2004;Aas, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%