2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0710-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic evaluation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis strategies: protocol for a methodological systematic review and quantitative synthesis

Abstract: BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretrovirals is an efficacious and effective intervention to decrease the risk of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) acquisition. Yet drug and delivery costs prohibit access in many jurisdictions. In the absence of guidelines for the synthesis of economic evaluations, we developed a protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluation studies for PrEP by drawing on best practices in systematic reviews and the conduct and reporting of economic evaluations. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with primary cost studies, activities like implementation research to inform decision‐making, target setting, awareness raising, technical assistance, and health information system strengthening—vital and catalytic investments in the early phase of introducing new products into the public health system—were not included. Our findings corroborate other reviews examining PrEP cost and cost‐effectiveness in mathematical modelling studies [23, 66–79]. Case et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with primary cost studies, activities like implementation research to inform decision‐making, target setting, awareness raising, technical assistance, and health information system strengthening—vital and catalytic investments in the early phase of introducing new products into the public health system—were not included. Our findings corroborate other reviews examining PrEP cost and cost‐effectiveness in mathematical modelling studies [23, 66–79]. Case et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As with primary cost studies, activities like implementation research to inform decision-making, target setting, awareness raising, technical assistance, and health information system strengthening-vital and catalytic investments in the early phase of introducing new products into the public health system-were not included. Our findings corroborate other reviews examining PrEP cost and cost-effectiveness in mathematical modelling studies [23,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. Case et al highlighted in a 2019 review the outdated assumptions in the modelling literature, the lack of "real-world costing" and the limitation of the modelling studies to include programme implementation, among other factors [23].…”
Section: Table 7 Economic Analysis Features and Analytic Approaches O...supporting
confidence: 88%