2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic evaluation of an enhanced homestead food production intervention for undernutrition in women and children in rural Cambodia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 24 Another study estimated the costs over 10 years of delivering an enhanced homestead food production intervention in rural Cambodia to be US$929 per household. 36 In Zimbabwe, a study found that the average costs per household reached of an intervention providing community vegetable gardens for people living with HIV were US$1890 in 2010. 37 A cross-country study in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and India found that the costs per child reached of agriculture and nutrition intervention varied widely, ranging from US$2650 for a livestock transfer program to US$0.58 for a media and education campaign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 Another study estimated the costs over 10 years of delivering an enhanced homestead food production intervention in rural Cambodia to be US$929 per household. 36 In Zimbabwe, a study found that the average costs per household reached of an intervention providing community vegetable gardens for people living with HIV were US$1890 in 2010. 37 A cross-country study in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and India found that the costs per child reached of agriculture and nutrition intervention varied widely, ranging from US$2650 for a livestock transfer program to US$0.58 for a media and education campaign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their treatment was not randomized and their baseline and endline data were collected in different seasons and over different samples of households-preventing them to apply a difference-in-difference (DD) or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) estimator to control for selection bias. Dragojlovic et al (2020) evaluated the effect of the HKI homestead food production program in Cambodia in a pragmatic field test, which showed positive effects on the production of fruits and livestock and the micronutrient intake of children. However, the control and intervention data were collected in different years and the study had a large sample attrition in the intervention group that was not controlled for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Для российских авторов экономическая безопасность региона, по своей сути, характеризует степень защищенности субъекта Российской Федерации от внешних и внутренних угроз различного свойства. Зарубежные авторы, с одной стороны, более широко определяют понятие «регион» (Среднеазиатский регион, Тихоокеанский регион), а с другой -сосредотачиваются на очень конкретных вопросах: региональной энергетической безопасности [Yuan, Luo, 2019], продовольственной безопасности домохозяйств [Dragojlovic et al, 2020], социальной защищенности пожилых людей [Mutchler et al, 2019]…”
Section: разработка методики оценки экономической безопасности регионunclassified