Economic effects of healthy ageing: functional limitation, forgone wages, and medical and long-term care costs

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the potential economic benefits of healthy ageing by obtaining estimates of the economic losses generated by functional limitations among middle-aged and older people. Utilising two data sources retrieved from nationally representative samples of the Japanese people, we analysed the association between functional limitation and economic indicators, including labour market outcomes, savings, investment, consumption, and unpaid activities among individuals aged ≥ 60. Using the estimated parameters from our micro-econometric analyses and the official statistics by the Japanese government and a previous study, we calculated the financial costs that can be averted if healthy ageing is achieved as foregone wages and formal medical/long-term care costs incurred by functional limitations. Our micro-econometric analyses found that functional limitation was associated with a 3% point increase in retirement probability, with a stronger association among those aged 60–69. Moreover, functional limitation was linked with higher total health spending and less active involvement in domestic work. Foregone wages generated by functional limitation were estimated to be approximately USD 266.4 million, driven mainly by individuals in their 60s. Long-term care costs, rather than medical care costs, for older people aged ≥ 85 accounted for most of the additional costs, indicating that the estimated medical and long-term costs generated by functional limitations were approximately USD 72.7 billion. Health interventions can yield economic benefits by preventing exits from the labour market due to health issues and reducing medical and long-term care costs.

Universal health coverage in the context of population ageing: catastrophic health expenditure and unmet need for healthcare

“…Assuming that older people need more care than younger people owing to more frequent chronic conditions, health gains (or losses) from investing (or not investing) in their health can be larger among older people. These health gains can bring positive economic effects, given that large social costs arise due to health issues among older people, including productivity loss and medical and long-term care costs [ 26 , 27 ]. Accordingly, older people or households with older family members are more likely to use care and experience CHE than younger people or households without older members [ 10 – 13 , 16 – 18 ].…”

Pre-COVID life expectancy, mortality, and burden of diseases for adults 70 years and older in Australia: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study

“…Policy targeting risk reduction, screening and evidence-based intervention is needed to optimise healthy aging and minimise personal, social and economic burden. 23 While some environmental and lifestyle risks are on the whole decreasing, for instance smoking, others like poor air quality are worsening 24 and require urgent coordinated intervention. Particularly, addressing inequity in access to health care and healthy lifestyles for minority groups and rural populations is critical 25 , 26 to target excess modifiable burden.…”

Active aging and health among older adults in China: a perspective based on downward intergenerational economic support

“…This expansion has complicated the construction of health indicators for older adults, leading to diverse opinions among scholars. For instance, Peter and Lorraine, among other scholars, use self-rated health to represent physical health status ( 7 , 8 ), though this measure alone introduces a degree of subjective heterogeneity; Zhang divides the health of the older adults into three categories: physical health, cognitive function, and self-rated health ( 9 ); Okamoto assesses the intrinsic capabilities of older adults by evaluating challenges in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL and IADL) and cognitive functions, considering also the certification status for public long-term care needs ( 10 ); Ye adopts the presence of chronic diseases as a measure of physiological health and evaluates the psychological health of the older adults through cognitive issues and depression symptoms ( 11 ); Lv and Zhang measure the physical health of older adults from both subjective and objective perspectives, using indicators such as receiving medical treatment and hospitalization ( 12 ); Yao and colleagues use the EQ-5D-3L scale’s five dimensions as standards to assess individual health status, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, utilizing scores from the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and utility values U to quantify quality of life ( 13 ).…”