1983
DOI: 10.1080/00220485.1983.10845020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Education Research: Part III, Statistical Estimation Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this stage, we collected, coded and analysed data simultaneously to understand which data to collect next (Glaser and Strauss, ). More specifically, our ongoing data collection process was controlled by the emerging theory rather than a list of variables (Becker, ). In other words, our approach was based on the need to collect more data to examine categories and their relationships and to ensure that representativeness in the categories exists (Glaser and Strauss, ; Chenitz and Swanson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, we collected, coded and analysed data simultaneously to understand which data to collect next (Glaser and Strauss, ). More specifically, our ongoing data collection process was controlled by the emerging theory rather than a list of variables (Becker, ). In other words, our approach was based on the need to collect more data to examine categories and their relationships and to ensure that representativeness in the categories exists (Glaser and Strauss, ; Chenitz and Swanson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we follow Walstad (1990) and use a stock model, whereby we attempt to explain students’ stock of economic knowledge or level of economics understanding , as measured by a set of examination results. An alternative approach that we do not follow is to explain economic learning or the change in the stock of knowledge (Becker, 1983a, 1983b and 1983c; Becker et al. , 1991).…”
Section: Empirical Methodology and Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also include other demographic variables that could affect the production function; examples include gender and number of total credit hours earned. Since letter grade is discrete and ordinal and we assume the error term is normally distributed; an ordered probit model is chosen for the analysis (Spector and Mazzeo, 1980; Becker, 1983; Borg, Mason, and Shapiro, 1989; Borg and Shapiro, 1996; Borooah, 2002; Greene, 2003; Raehsler et al, 2012). The ordered probit differs from the ordered logit in its assumption of the error term being normally distributed as opposed to logistically distributed; however, as Greene (2003) points out, “it is difficult to justify the choice of one distribution over the other on theoretical grounds when in most cases it seems to not make much of a difference.” The ordered probit model takes the form: y*=β'x+εwhere y * is the unobserved latent dependent variable, (coded as 0, 1, 2, and 3) for letter grades of D, C, B, and A, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%