2020
DOI: 10.1111/grow.12363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic development incentive program deadweight: The role of program design features, firm characteristics, and location

Abstract: This paper examines the effectiveness of state economic development incentive programs in stimulating new business activity. It reviews literature that identifies factors that potentially influence the effectiveness of incentives. Empirical work draws on a 2018 survey of approximately 150 firms that received at least one award for startup, expansion, or relocation purposes during the period SFY2010–SFY2016 from a state economic development incentive program (i.e., grant, tax credit, loan, equity investment) of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the "but for" effect formula is based on firm reactions to business cost changes due to tax changes, it more typifies the likely firm response to an automatic or non-discretionary tax reduction rather than discretionary incentive. Ordinarily, greater discretion and due diligence may be expected to improve the likelihood of selecting only those projects most at risk of expanding elsewhere rather than providing the incentive across the board(Rephann, 2020). 12 Based on the site selection consultant estimate that business-ready sites can save firms $50,000 for megasites (i.e., 1,000 acre plus park) reported earlier, the average incentive per acre of $500 equates to an estimated savings of $279 per worker occupant of a Virginia industrial park.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the "but for" effect formula is based on firm reactions to business cost changes due to tax changes, it more typifies the likely firm response to an automatic or non-discretionary tax reduction rather than discretionary incentive. Ordinarily, greater discretion and due diligence may be expected to improve the likelihood of selecting only those projects most at risk of expanding elsewhere rather than providing the incentive across the board(Rephann, 2020). 12 Based on the site selection consultant estimate that business-ready sites can save firms $50,000 for megasites (i.e., 1,000 acre plus park) reported earlier, the average incentive per acre of $500 equates to an estimated savings of $279 per worker occupant of a Virginia industrial park.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%