2020
DOI: 10.1111/saje.12248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Development and South Africa: 25 Years Analysis (1994 to 2019)

Abstract: Economic Development highlights the growth and progression of every nation towards prosperity, and South Africa is not an exception to this phenomenon. Present article reviews economic progression in South Africa for last 25 years of time by applying systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (1,241 articles) on Scopus extracted database (1994 to 2019; until 06 June). Inferences evidence significant work contributed by top universities, authors, funding sources, journals and citation statistics. No… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(178 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prime focus was to recognize the available practices under the employee development that address the desires of the Generation-Z employees to remain at the IT workplace in the post-COVID-19 environment. Based on previous works from Bos-Nehles and Renkema (2017), Dhamija (2020) and Baliga et al (2020), for this paper, four stages of systematic literature search process has been adopted; the process is illustrated in Table 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prime focus was to recognize the available practices under the employee development that address the desires of the Generation-Z employees to remain at the IT workplace in the post-COVID-19 environment. Based on previous works from Bos-Nehles and Renkema (2017), Dhamija (2020) and Baliga et al (2020), for this paper, four stages of systematic literature search process has been adopted; the process is illustrated in Table 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absurdity of attempts to explain the continued severity of the sufferance of the majority of South Africans under a constitutional democracy by predicating such understandings against the cruelty of apartheid amounts to academic intellectual sloth and political denialism (see Maharaj, Desai & Bond, 2011;Tsheola & Lukhele, 2014;Tsheola, Ramonyai & Segage, 2014). Whilst the ruling ANC remain consumed with itself (Tsheola & Molefe, 2019;Boesak, 2023), the governance mechanisms in almost all spheres of the South African existence have been deficient and defective (Tsheola & Sebola, 2012;Tsheola, 2013Tsheola, , 2017Dhamija, 2020;. The inexplicable replacement of the 1994 Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) with the 1996 foreign-grown Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) revealed the ANC's governance utopianism which is inconsistent with the uniqueness of the spatiality and geography difference of South Africa (see Tsheola, 2002aTsheola, , 2002b.…”
Section: Unitary Realities Oneness Of Science and Humanity's Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the former national liberation movement's aspiration to achieve "a better life for all" South Africans, the adoption of GEAR was always going to be deficient as well as the hyperbolic launch of the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (AsgiSA) together with the Joint Initiative on Priority Skills Acquisition (Jipsa) in 2006, proved to be deficient (see Tsheola, 2012b). At the point of twenty years of the democratic experiment, it was already unambiguously evident that the promise of "a better life for all" was a pipe dream (see Tsheola & Sebola, 2012;Tsheola, 2013Tsheola, , 2017Tsheola & Lukhele, 2014;Tsheola, Ramonyai & Segage, 2014;Chipkin, 2016;Dhamija, 2020;. Since then, the ANC government has virtually subjected South Africans to a dizzying rollercoaster of basic services deficiencies, poverty, inequality, unemployment, corruption, state capture and dysfunctional state institutions, violence and defective governance (see Chipkin 2016;Fazekas & Tóth, 2016;Labuschagne, 2017;Mamabolo & Tsheola, 2017;Tsheola & Mmotlana, 2018;de Klerk & Solomon, 2019;Tsheola & Molefe, 2019;Dhamija, 2020;.…”
Section: Unitary Realities Oneness Of Science and Humanity's Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations