1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-5398(98)00007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic determinants of evolution in international stock market integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
157
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
19
157
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that higher DY and PE positively impact the Indian equity market, bringing in international capital flows and thereby increasing return comovements during periods of economic expansion. While similar findings are reported by some recent research on international market linkages (Aloui et al 2011;Bracker et al 1999;Panchenko and Wu 2009), they do not specifically show the influence of the domestic and international factors on the dependence measure during the expansion and contraction regimes of the economy. The stock market indicator, MC, bears the same sign as the other market indicator, TR.…”
Section: Economic Factor Contributionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that higher DY and PE positively impact the Indian equity market, bringing in international capital flows and thereby increasing return comovements during periods of economic expansion. While similar findings are reported by some recent research on international market linkages (Aloui et al 2011;Bracker et al 1999;Panchenko and Wu 2009), they do not specifically show the influence of the domestic and international factors on the dependence measure during the expansion and contraction regimes of the economy. The stock market indicator, MC, bears the same sign as the other market indicator, TR.…”
Section: Economic Factor Contributionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They complete their response within a period of two weeks. Given that our study is based on weekly data, this response can be considered as efficient in line with Beechey et al (2000); Bracker et al (1999) and Roca (1999). Figure 4 further shows that the funds respond to the US equity market shock in a larger manner during regime 2 which means that the funds are more sensitive to the market during the down market regime and less sensitive during the up market state-a situation that is not desirable and therefore indicative of lack of market timing success.…”
Section: Impulse Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Secondly, markets within a short geographic distance tend to display greater co-movement than those farther apart (Bracker, Docking, & Koch, 1999;Pirinsky & Wang, 2006;Chong, Wong, & Zhang, 2011;Eckel, Loffler, Maurer, & Schmidt, 2011). Thirdly, market interdependence increases as economic integration intensifies, such as increased bilateral trade (Bracker, Docking, & Koch, 1999;Johnson & Soenen, 2002;Pretorius, 2002;Tavares, 2009;Walti, 2011;Abbas, Khan, & Shah, 2013).…”
Section: Literature On Financial Market Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, market interdependence increases as economic integration intensifies, such as increased bilateral trade (Bracker, Docking, & Koch, 1999;Johnson & Soenen, 2002;Pretorius, 2002;Tavares, 2009;Walti, 2011;Abbas, Khan, & Shah, 2013). Fourthly, market interdependence is most likely high in volatile bear markets (Longin & Solnik, 2001;Ang & Bekaert, 2002;Aityan, Ivanov-Schitz, & Izotov, 2010;Jinjarak & Zheng, 2014).…”
Section: Literature On Financial Market Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%