1994
DOI: 10.1080/08982119408918736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Design and Development of Specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will demonstrate that all these functions yield optimal solutions that do not vary significantly. Using Taylor series expansion, Kapur and Cho 61 derived an approximation to Taguchi's expected loss function for the L-type quality characteristic as…”
Section: Optimization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will demonstrate that all these functions yield optimal solutions that do not vary significantly. Using Taylor series expansion, Kapur and Cho 61 derived an approximation to Taguchi's expected loss function for the L-type quality characteristic as…”
Section: Optimization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptance limits, quality levels, specifications Kapur and Cho (1994) propose optimization models for the economic design and development of specifications: generic models for each type 1 of quality characteristic are developed and substantiated by two case studies. Wei et al (1999) propose a tolerance design model to minimize the overall scrap in a process chain.…”
Section: Sample Size and Sampling Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeang 14 demonstrated how response surface methodology can be employed to determine tolerances of components in an assembly. Kapur 15 , Kapur and Cho 16 , and Kapur and Cho 17 considered a tolerance optimization problem using truncated normal, Weibull, and multivariate normal distributions, respectively. Phillips and Cho 7 studied minimization of the quality loss and the rejection costs, where quality loss is determined empirically by applying regression analysis to historical data of losses.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%