Economic coping strategies and food security in poor rural households

Abstract

Purpose. This study aims to analyze economic coping strategies and their relationship to the food security of poor rural households.
 Methodology / approach. This research was conducted by comparing food crop farming households with those who farm plantation crops. The used data were sourced from surveys in four sample rural areas in two districts of Jambi Province, Indonesia, namely Merangin Regency and Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency. The used analysis tool was Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
 Results. The results show that poor rural households’ economic coping strategies are still low, both in the context of a passive strategy (cutting back expenses) and an active strategy (generating income). Plantation households have a lower economic coping strategy than food crop farming households. The level of food security in food crop households is relatively good compared to that of plantation crop households. Nearly half of food crop households are categorized as having good food security, while only around 20 % of plantation crop households are so categorized. Family characteristics and coping strategies significantly influence household food security in plantation crop households. On the other hand, the level of household food security in food crop households is not influenced by coping strategies, but only by family characteristics.
 Originality / scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the study is in a study approach that links household food security with coping strategies and family socio-economic conditions. Furthermore, this study specifically conducted a comparative study of households of food crop farmers and plantation crop farmers, considering that these are the two main livelihood commodities for rural residents.
 Practical value / implications. Through this research, it is hoped that the concept/theory of improving the food security of poor households (especially in rural areas) can be developed based on the potential and real conditions of the households themselves, so that the formulated policies can be more effective and sustainable.

Is the second generation of transmigrants more prosperous? A study of intergenerational welfare in ex-transmigration settlements

“…This proportion, associated with the dominance of employment in the agricultural sector, indicates that income from employment in the agricultural sector is deemed insufficient to meet the needs of the second generation. The results of this study are consistent with previous findings (Junaidi et al, 2022), which suggest that rural communities' strategy for increasing incomes is to find side jobs.…”

Food security and economic coping strategies among fishing households: Insights from Tanjung Jabung Timur and Tanjung Jabung Barat, Jambi Province

“…Research by Praza & Shamadiyah (2020) in North Aceh, Devi et al (2020) in Ciamis, Yuliana et al (2013) in Bandar Lampung, and Sukandar (2007) in Banjar have identified socioeconomic factors affecting food security, including age, education, head of household's occupation, household knowledge, family size, asset ownership, household income, and location. Junaidi et al (2022) observed differences in food security between plantation and food crop households, where family characteristics and coping strategies influenced food security in plantation households, but not in food crop households. Furthermore, Junaidi et al (2020) found that economic coping strategies and social capital significantly influence food security among poor urban households in Jambi Province.…”

Contribution of Fruits and Vegetables to the Household Food Security Situation of Rural Households in Limpopo

“…Families with many household members can divide duties among each other in production or agricultural activities. In return, they can increase the food produced for consumption and surplus, which can generate income; hence, households consume a more diversified diet and increase their food availability [43].…”