2010
DOI: 10.13031/2013.34939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Comparison of Liquid Manure Transport and Land Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, greater redistribution of slurry constituents in a soil with few preferential flow paths may increase the interaction between matrix flow and contaminants and, hence, leaching. Surface application, being less expensive (23) and less risky with regard to contaminant leaching, may be the best choice for loamy soil types, especially for dilute slurries, and for fields with less risk of surface runoff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, greater redistribution of slurry constituents in a soil with few preferential flow paths may increase the interaction between matrix flow and contaminants and, hence, leaching. Surface application, being less expensive (23) and less risky with regard to contaminant leaching, may be the best choice for loamy soil types, especially for dilute slurries, and for fields with less risk of surface runoff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slurry is usually applied to agricultural fields by surface application or, increasingly, by subsurface injection at 6-to 10-cm soil depth to reduce nuisance odor and NH 3 volatilization from the applied slurry (23,24,25). These two application methods may represent different risks for leaching of nutrients and microorganisms as a result of the difference in slurry-soil contact (21,26,27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low nutrient density of manure also limits the distance it can economically be transported, particularly for dairy or swine slurries, where a large part of the mass is made up of water rather than nutrients (Withers et al, 2015). Hadrich et al (2010), for example, found that the hauling and application costs for liquid dairy manure exceeded the value of the nutrients in the manure where the transport distance exceeded about 12 km. Another study in Texas found the breakeven manure transport distance ranged from 28 to 41 km but that the areas of nutrient deficit were 40 to 90 km from the dairy farms studied (Adhikari et al, 2005).…”
Section: Options For Mitigating Phosphorus Imbalancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this localization of livestock operations and separation from arable lands include a diverse mix of cultural, economic, governmental, and physical factors, and these are likely significant barriers to promoting a more even distribution of livestock operations across the landscape. A number of papers have discussed potential methods to reduce P imbalance (Hadrich et al, 2010; Hanserud et al, 2017; Malmaeus and Karlsson, 2010), but all of these assessments have treated the location of the livestock operations as a given, with no consideration of relocation of livestock operations as an option. A review paper by McDowell et al (2016) presents some notable successes with managing nutrients from existing or expanding livestock operations in New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, but the only mention of dealing with existing areas of P surplus was that “policy may have to consider land use change.”…”
Section: Options For Mitigating Phosphorus Imbalancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the cover would prevent rain from collecting in the manure storage, we subtracted savings from avoided hauling of this rainwater from the storage unit to the field. Hauling on large farms can cost an estimated $0.005 L −1 , whereas on smaller farms, hauling for shorter distances can cost $0.0032 L −1 (Hadrich et al, 2010). Because there are many variables that affect rainwater hauling costs (e.g., larger farms generally have longer distances to field, amount of rainfall varies across the region, and hauling methods such as pumps or tankers) we averaged the 175‐cow dairy with the 1400‐cow dairy to address a range in transport costs across the state ($0.004 L −1 ; Hadrich et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%