2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic calibrated models for water allocation in agricultural production: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by Graveline [37], the regional-scale modeling permits the reduction of data needed and ensures the quality of data employed. At the same time, field-level water management strategies play an important role as basic elements for water use efficiency [43].…”
Section: Water Management Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out by Graveline [37], the regional-scale modeling permits the reduction of data needed and ensures the quality of data employed. At the same time, field-level water management strategies play an important role as basic elements for water use efficiency [43].…”
Section: Water Management Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows exploring the optimal solutions from a policy-makers perspective, especially when sufficient homogeneity is observed across the region and it can be considered as a large farm [37]. Each study area should be large enough to contain a significant number of farms, while the focus on an "irrigation unit" would avoid introducing sources of variation related either to agro-climatic or economic conditions [38].…”
Section: The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of agricultural systems, the agents' decisions include crop selection and land management (e.g., fertilization), water application, and investments in capital stock. This complex decision‐making problem involves multiple inputs and is often simplified by assuming each possible combination of crops and management techniques as a unique crop x i (Graveline, ). This assumption allows the decision‐making problem to be reduced to a choice on the crop portfolio ( x ) within a domain ( F ( x )), where the crop portfolio ( x ) is a vector representing the land share devoted to each individual crop ( x i ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 2 elements shaped different types of implementation activities that, during the second part of the 4‐y project, will aggregate the analysis of the water vulnerabilities (phase 1) and the results of the validation of technologies (phase 2): Two decision support tools (DSTs) will be developed and adapted to the selected basins (Akter et al ; Hamouda et al ): the first will support the analysis and selection of WW treatment technologies and facilitate their integration into basin‐scale WW management strategies, whereas the second will integrate the project's irrigation technologies into basin‐scale strategies for water and land management in agriculture. The second DST will be based on the development of and calibration to the 3 selected basins (Table ) of an integrated hydro‐agro‐economic model capable of optimizing cropping patterns and water allocation (D'Agostino et al ; Esteve et al ; Graveline ). The DSTs will be used to develop strategies for WW management and for agricultural water and land management, tailored for the 3 selected hydrological basins (Table ). The WW management strategies, aimed at maximizing the amount of irrigation‐quality treated WW produced, will include elements such as the addition of a WW technology to treat the effluent of an existing WW treatment plant or the identification of economic instruments that enhance the implementation of innovative WW treatment technologies.…”
Section: The Madforwater Strategy To Enhance Wastewater Treatment Wamentioning
confidence: 99%