2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12343-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic burden of varicella in Europe in the absence of universal varicella vaccination

Abstract: Background Though the disease burden of varicella in Europe has been reported previously, the economic burden is still unknown. This study estimated the economic burden of varicella in Europe in the absence of Universal Varicella Vaccination (UVV) in 2018 Euros from both payer (direct costs) and societal (direct and indirect costs) perspectives. Methods We estimated the country specific and overall annual costs of varicella in absence of UVV in 31 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since vaccine hesitancy is already recognized by the World Health Organization as one of the 10 biggest threads to global health [ 112 ], identification of factors that enhance individuals’ intention to accept vaccination is crucial to increase vaccine uptake. Several systematic reviews suggest that vaccination against a variety of diseases (i.e., pneumococcal disease, varicella, tuberculosis) is a cost-effective or cost-saving intervention [ 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 ]. Additionally, a recent systematic review showed that the COVID-19 vaccination program appears to be a cost-effective or cost-saving intervention [ 117 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since vaccine hesitancy is already recognized by the World Health Organization as one of the 10 biggest threads to global health [ 112 ], identification of factors that enhance individuals’ intention to accept vaccination is crucial to increase vaccine uptake. Several systematic reviews suggest that vaccination against a variety of diseases (i.e., pneumococcal disease, varicella, tuberculosis) is a cost-effective or cost-saving intervention [ 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 ]. Additionally, a recent systematic review showed that the COVID-19 vaccination program appears to be a cost-effective or cost-saving intervention [ 117 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varicella cases with complications were not only associated with higher annual cost of antiviral and antibiotic prescriptions but also add to other direct (e.g., hospitalization, over-the-counter medications.) and indirect costs (e.g., productivity loss due to caregiver absenteeism) associated with varicella, which are not accounted for in this study [2,[24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 That is, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association suggest COVID-19 vaccination as soon as possible to individuals with heart failure, heart disease, heart attack, and cardiovascular risk factors since they are high risk groups to develop COVID-19 outcomes. 12 Although vaccination promotes public health and it is a cost-effectiveness intervention even in case of COVID-19, [13][14][15] vaccine hesitancy is still one of the biggest threats to global health 16 . Socio-demographic variables, psychological factors, vaccine hesitancy, COVID-19 related variables, personal beliefs, knowledge, fear, conspiracy theories, fake news, and trust are the most important factors that influence individuals' decision to accept the COVID-19 vaccines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%