Economic benefit of wildlife reintroduction: A case of elk hunting in Tennessee, USA

Chapagain, Binod; Poudyal, Neelam C.

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110808

Cited by 12 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA) released 201 elk into the zone between 2000 and 2008, and these were estimated to be c. 350 in number by 2016 (Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency 2018). A lottery-based hunting programme has since been established to manage the elk population in the region (Chapagain & Poudyal 2020).…”

Section: Study Area and Research Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk perception, trust and support for wildlife reintroduction and conservation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Wildlife reintroduction projects often face resistance from local residents who see potential conflicts with the species or lack trust or confidence in the agencies and professionals involved in reintroduction. Yet the linkages between trust, confidence, risk perceptions, attitudes towards the species and local support for its reintroduction are not well known. The Dual-Mode Model of Cooperation and Cognitive Hierarchy Model were theoretical frameworks used to shed light on these linkages by exploring the potential roles trust and confidence play as mediators between risk perceptions and attitudes towards, and support for, reintroduced elk in Tennessee (USA). A mail survey of 1005 residents living in the five-county area surrounding the North Cumberland Elk Restoration Zone assessed resident attitudes and risk perceptions towards the reintroduced elk, trust towards the managing wildlife agency and support for continued conservation efforts. A structural equation model revealed that trust and confidence play positive roles in mitigating risk perceptions and improving support for the reintroduction of elk. The findings confirm the roles public trust and confidence play in wildlife reintroductions and should help agencies work towards building local trust and confidence, minimizing risks, improving attitudes and increasing the chances for successful outcomes for the species and people.

show abstract

Section: Study Area and Research Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk perception, trust and support for wildlife reintroduction and conservation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The methodology adopted is the travel-cost method, one of the most widely used methodologies for estimating the recreational value of this type of CES [37]. The recreational use value is a very important parameter to structure short-and long-term land management and to development policies that assess not only the values of market products (e.g., timber and agricultural products), but also the values of non-market services (e.g., landscape and recreation) generated by territories.…”

Section: The Travel-cost Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The monetary value of recreational activities like hunting is not easy to determine, as there is no real market for these services and consequently there is no market price. In economics, to estimate the benefits generated by non-market goods or services, different evaluation methods are used, which can be divided into stated or revealed preference methods [37,42,59]. Revealed preference methods relate the enjoyment of non-market environmental goods or services to the costs incurred for the purchase of market goods that are indispensable to benefit from the good or service under analysis [42].…”

Section: The Travel-cost Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Instead, the economic evaluation methodology used in the present research was the travel-cost method (TCM). First of all, it is the most widely used method in the literature for the assessment of CESs in general [11,12,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. Moreover, there are many studies in the literature that use TCM to estimate the value of recreational activities such as hunting [37][38][39][40]42], in which travel, even of considerable length, is necessary to enjoy an activity practiced exclusively in rural areas far from urban contexts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First of all, it is the most widely used method in the literature for the assessment of CESs in general [11,12,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. Moreover, there are many studies in the literature that use TCM to estimate the value of recreational activities such as hunting [37][38][39][40]42], in which travel, even of considerable length, is necessary to enjoy an activity practiced exclusively in rural areas far from urban contexts. In fact, because of this, the costs incurred for travel represent a significant factor within the total expenditure incurred annually by hunters that is worth investigating.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Model for the Economic Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Recreational Hunting Function in the Agroforestry Territories of Tuscany (Italy)

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are non-material benefits generated by natural and human ecosystems that substantially contribute to human wellbeing. Estimating the monetary value of CESs is challenging because there is no real market for these services and therefore there is no actual market price. This study seeks to define an economic evaluation method for these services, with special reference to a recreational CES that has so far received little discussion: hunting. We conducted an online survey in the province of Siena (Tuscany, Italy). The Consumer Surplus estimate of hunters was made using the travel-cost method with a detailed analysis of the annual expenditure on hunting activities, and a negative binomial statistical regression. The results reflect the nature of hunting activity and show the dynamics that have occurred over recent decades. In fact, whereas hunting used to be strongly connected to the rural world as it was an income supplement for local communities, nowadays it has turned into an elitist and almost exclusively recreational activity. In any case, knowing the economic value of ecosystem services constitutes an essential background for planning effective land management and development policies in the short and long term.

show abstract

Roles for Wildlife in the Development of Place Meanings Ascribed to a Protected Area

Salcido

Riper

Stewart

et al. 2023

Environmental Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wildlife play prominent roles in popular images of America's outdoor landscapes, yet our understanding of their contribution to place meanings is not fully developed. Although environmental management agencies have a long history of stewarding wildlife for hunting and shing, they have been less inclined to prioritize non-consumptive uses such as the contribution of wildlife to sense of place. Given that agencies are increasingly challenged to implement policies that align with citizen priorities, connecting wildlife to sense of place could lead to more effective decisions. Our research explored the plurality of connections that residents made with wildlife in multiple protected areas across the USA region of Interior Alaska. Residents of nine communities were engaged over a ve-year period, followed by a thematic analysis of interview data, which resulted in the identi cation of seven place meaning themes. These themes re ected qualities of the local environment that were appreciated by residents, including: 1) desirable travel destination, 2) distinct sense of community, 3) landscape of subsistence and tradition, 4) landscape of wildlife habitat, 5) natural resources in need of harvesting, 6) rural Alaskan lifestyle, and 7) wildland areas tied to recreation. Native wildlife species -from traditionally charismatic species like moose (Alces alces) to less iconic species such as snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) -were discussed in the context of all seven place meaning themes. Wildlife provided a basis for study participants to interpret landscapes and ascribe meanings to places, thus supporting our argument that shared in uences of wildlife and place meanings should be prioritized in environmental planning and management.

show abstract

Economic benefit of wildlife reintroduction: A case of elk hunting in Tennessee, USA

Cited by 12 publications

References 38 publications

Risk perception, trust and support for wildlife reintroduction and conservation

Risk perception, trust and support for wildlife reintroduction and conservation

A Model for the Economic Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Recreational Hunting Function in the Agroforestry Territories of Tuscany (Italy)

Roles for Wildlife in the Development of Place Meanings Ascribed to a Protected Area

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About