Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities

Abstract

The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. While there is a large amount of literature on the economic aspects of delivering primary care services, there is a need for more comprehensive overviews of this evidence. In this article, we offer such an overview. Evidence suggests that there are several strategies involving coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements which can, if implemented, have positive economic impacts on the delivery of primary care services. These include arrangements such as worker task‐shifting and telemedicine. The implementation of any such arrangements, based on positive economic evidence, should carefully account for potential impacts on overall health care access and quality. There are many opportunities for further research, with notable gaps in evidence on the impacts of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. Context The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. To strengthen primary health care, policymakers need guidance on how to allocate resources in a manner that maximizes its economic benefits. Methods We collated and synthesized published systematic reviews of evidence on the economic aspects of different models of delivering primary care services. Building on previous efforts, we adapted existing taxonomies of primary care components to classify our results according to four categories: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance. Findings We identified and classified 109 reviews that met our inclusion criteria according to our taxonomy of primary care components: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements. A significant body of evidence suggests that several specific primary care arrangements, such as health workers' task shifting and telemedicine, can have positive economic impacts (such as lower overall health care costs). Notably absent were reviews on the impact of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. Conclusions There is a great opportunity for further research to systematically examine the broader economic impacts of investing in primary care services. Despite progress over the last decade, significant evidence gaps on the economic implications of different models of primary care services remain, which could help inform the basis of future research efforts.

Preventable mortality in the Russian Federation: a retrospective, regional level study

“…In addition, this finding could be a direct reflection of the lower density of nurses in some of the oblasts in the Siberian and Far East Federal Districts. As the overall preventable mortality is due to causes that could be addressed by strong primary healthcare, 62 , 63 we do not find statistical significance for the density of physicians and hospital beds. Whilst the density of doctors may be associated with a longer-term reduction in mortality, this falls outside of the scope of this paper.…”

Persistent inequalities in health care services utilisation in Brazil (1998–2019)

“…Among our findings, the decreasing trends we observed with respect to the use of mammograms were also identified in other services that targeted a specific segment of the adult population (i.e., blood sugar tests), but not for other services (i.e., blood pressure and cholesterol testing). These results suggest that the decreasing trends we observed with respect to the use of mammograms, which is a preventive service provided to women only, will also be relevant to services that target the adult population (i.e., blood sugar tests) and also may reflect improvements in primary care services over time [ 39 , 40 ]. However, the fact that inequalities persist in other preventive services suggests that many of these improvements might not be general in nature.…”

Unmet need for healthcare in the Russian Federation: subnational retrospective modelling analysis (2014–2018)

“…First, efforts to de-emphasise the current heavy reliance on secondary healthcare might be coupled with investments in enhancing PHC might help to reduce the extent of unmet need at the regional/ oblast level. 55 This might be accompanied by efforts to ameliorate some of the financial barriers affecting those seeking healthcare. The extent to which some or all of these challenges might be addressed given the current political climate remains to be seen.…”