2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic and social leader–member exchange relationships and follower performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
195
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
195
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Bollen, 1989;Muthén, 1989). We followed Kuvaas, Buch, Dysvik, and Haerem (2012) and estimated a multiple indicator multiple causes (MIMIC) model to control for sample heterogeneity when performing the CFA. Because "ordinal variables are not continuous and should not be treated as if they are" (Jöreskog, 2005, p.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bollen, 1989;Muthén, 1989). We followed Kuvaas, Buch, Dysvik, and Haerem (2012) and estimated a multiple indicator multiple causes (MIMIC) model to control for sample heterogeneity when performing the CFA. Because "ordinal variables are not continuous and should not be treated as if they are" (Jöreskog, 2005, p.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, however, LMX research has focused on the social exchange relationship by and large and has not included the separate dimension of the economic exchange relationship developed and measured by Shore et al (2006). Recently, however, Kuvaas et al (2012b) contributed to the LMX literature by developing and measuring the transactional exchange dimension of dyadic leader-member exchange in the form of ELMX.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the exchanges rest on downward influence, formal status differences, and discrete agreements, and they demand repayment within a particular time period (Kuvaas et al, 2012b). Furthermore, employees' motivation to donate knowledge in ELMX relationships would probably be more instrumental, and knowledge-sharing will more likely be considered as extra-role behavior that needs to be rewarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, in responding to calls for research integrating the transformational leadership and LMX literatures (Gerstner & Day, 1997;Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995;Howell & Hall-Merenda, 1999), we intend to contribute to research on laissez-faire (destructive) leadership by providing an explanation for the negative relationships between laissez-faire and affective organizational commitment, work effort, and OCB. Second, Kuvaas, Buch, Dysvik, and Haerem (2012) found that an ELMX relationship negatively related to subordinates' work performance and organizational citizenship behaviors. Such findings call for more research on potential antecedents to an ELMX relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%