2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic and financial sustainability of an Acacia decurrens-based Taungya system for farmers in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with our initial hypothesis as well with results from previous studies (Curman et al 2016 ; Hand et al 2019 ; Joshi and Mehmood 2011 ; Proctor and Lucchesi 2012 ; Qu et al 2016 ; Van Dael et al 2017 ), who found that younger household heads are more open to trying (and reaping) the benefits of new ventures (e.g., technologies or emerging markets) or have more positive affective and cognitive evaluations of new bioenergy sources. In addition, because this group derives fewer benefits from the current plantation system than older farmers (Nigussie et al 2020 ; Nigussie et al 2021 ), the results may also imply that younger farmers have higher expectations of spillover benefits (e.g., employment opportunities) from any additional demand for services in the biomass supply chain. A plausible explanation that can be advanced for this view is that younger farmers, who are healthier, have a higher ability, and thus they are more likely to foresee and show interest, to partake in any off-farm wage employment options of the proposed bioenergy program than older farmers (Proctor and Lucchesi 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with our initial hypothesis as well with results from previous studies (Curman et al 2016 ; Hand et al 2019 ; Joshi and Mehmood 2011 ; Proctor and Lucchesi 2012 ; Qu et al 2016 ; Van Dael et al 2017 ), who found that younger household heads are more open to trying (and reaping) the benefits of new ventures (e.g., technologies or emerging markets) or have more positive affective and cognitive evaluations of new bioenergy sources. In addition, because this group derives fewer benefits from the current plantation system than older farmers (Nigussie et al 2020 ; Nigussie et al 2021 ), the results may also imply that younger farmers have higher expectations of spillover benefits (e.g., employment opportunities) from any additional demand for services in the biomass supply chain. A plausible explanation that can be advanced for this view is that younger farmers, who are healthier, have a higher ability, and thus they are more likely to foresee and show interest, to partake in any off-farm wage employment options of the proposed bioenergy program than older farmers (Proctor and Lucchesi 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that acacia growers belonging to a higher-earning category, holding all else constant, generally were more likely to favor such biomass supply initiatives. It is very likely that wealthier farmers, either through their larger land holdings or their greater capacity to buy acacia stands from resource-poor farmers, could commit more acreage to cultivation of acacia plantations (Nigussie et al 2017 ; Nigussie et al 2020 ). This, in turn, would allow them to produce enough woody biomass residues for self-consumption as well as having the resources to collect and prepare biomass for selling to the hypothetical biomass program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations