2019
DOI: 10.3329/jbau.v17i1.40673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic analysis of tilapia farming in some selected area of Dinajpur District: A comparison between monoculture and polyculture

Abstract: The study was conducted to assess the cost and return from tilapia farming. Fifty homestead aquaculture ponds practicing monoculture and polyculture of tilapia (25 farmers from each category) were selected for this study. Data had been collected through face to face interview by using a structured questionnaire during April to September 2015 from the selected farmers of Dinajpur districts. The results from the survey revealed that both the tilapia monoculture and polyculture farming were profitable. However, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 7 reveals that the benefit-cost ratio of fish farming for cash cost was 2.08 and benefit-cost ratio of fish farming for full cost was 1.86 (overall). These values are higher than the findings of Ferdoushi et al (2019) which were 1.34 for polyculture and 1.51 for tilapia monoculture. On the basis of the above discussion, it could be concluded that fish culture is profitable.…”
Section: Net Returncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…From Table 7 reveals that the benefit-cost ratio of fish farming for cash cost was 2.08 and benefit-cost ratio of fish farming for full cost was 1.86 (overall). These values are higher than the findings of Ferdoushi et al (2019) which were 1.34 for polyculture and 1.51 for tilapia monoculture. On the basis of the above discussion, it could be concluded that fish culture is profitable.…”
Section: Net Returncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…From Table 8 reveals that the benefit-cost ratio of tilapia-carp farming for cash cost was 1.78 and benefit-cost ratio of tilapia-carp farming for full cost was 1.58 (overall). These values are higher than the findings of Ferdoushi et al (2019) which were 1.34 for polyculture and 1.51 for tilapia monoculture. On the basis of the above discussion, it could be concluded that tilapia-carp polyculture is profitable.…”
Section: Net Returncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…2 After the first month of growth, we also stocked the following Indian Major Carps: Rohu (Labeo rohita) and Mrigal (Cirrhinus Mrigala), weighing 125 g each, at a rate of 40 per pond, and Catla (Catla Catla), weighing 140 g each, at a rate of 20 per pond. The stocking ratio of Tilapia: Carp was thus 8:1, which represents a typical stocking strategy in the area (Ferdoushi et al, 2019;Heal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Aquaculture Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%