1999
DOI: 10.4314/acsj.v7i4.27752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic analysis of maize-bean production using a soil fertility replenishment product (PREP-PAC) in Western Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soils at the study sites had generally low soil fertility (Table 10) and the farmers considered these the most fertility-depleted areas of their farms (Nekesa et al 1999). Table 9.…”
Section: Crop Responses To Inorganic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soils at the study sites had generally low soil fertility (Table 10) and the farmers considered these the most fertility-depleted areas of their farms (Nekesa et al 1999). Table 9.…”
Section: Crop Responses To Inorganic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PREP-PAC consists of 2 kg MPR, 0.2 kg urea, 120 g food legume seed, rhizobial inoculant (Biofix) packed with lime pellets to raise the pH of the inoculated seed environment and gum Arabic sticker to hold the inoculant onto the surface of the seed and instructions for use written in English, Kiswahili and local dialects. One packet is designed to replenish soil fertility of patches of size 25-m 2 (Nekesa et al 1999). …”
Section: Crop Responses To Inorganic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This product comprises PR (2 kg), urea (0.2 kg), legume seed, rhizobial seed inoculants, seed adhesive and lime pellet, packed to fertilize 25 m 2 of land. In Western Kenya the use of PREP-PAC and climbing bean package increased maize and bean yield by 0.72 and 0.25 t ha -1 respectively, resulting in a 161% return in investment (Nekesa et al, 1999). PREP-PAC use on bean for the two seasons in seven districts in Easter Uganda showed significant increases of 881 kg ha -1 in bean yield, increasing from 1,316 to 2,197 kg ha -1 (Esilaba et al, 2005).…”
Section: Wwwintechopencommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, analysis of results for the two seasons in 2000 on 41 non-test farms 329 in seven districts in eastern Uganda show significant increases of 881 kg ha À1 in bean 330 yield from 1316 to 2197 kg ha À1 . Bean yields in western Kenya were increased by 331 Prep-pacs from less than 200-500 kg ha À1 (Okalebo, 1999) and yields for bush and 332 climbing beans increased from 25 to 125 kg and from 200 to 450 kg ha, À1 respectively 333 (Nekesa et al, 1999). Use of a combined Prep-pac and climbing bean package in-334 creased maize and bean yields by 720 and 250 kg ha À1 , resulting in a 161% return 335 on investment.…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 315 both aluminium and manganese toxicity do not usually occur in the same soil. Re-316 ports from western Kenya show that Prep-pacs increased maize yields from an aver-317 age of 800 kg to almost 2000 kg ha À1 (Okalebo, 1999) and from 640 to 1360 kg ha À1 318 (Nekesa et al, 1999). Prep-pacs did not significantly increase bean yields on the test 319 farms but grain yields improved by 14-157 kg ha À1 in the two seasons in 2000 (Table 320 7 (Table 7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%