Economic Analysis of Infectious Disease Consultation forStaphylococcus aureusBacteremia Among Hospitalized Patients

Abstract

ImportanceStaphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with a significant burden of mortality, morbidity, and health care costs. Infectious disease consultation may be associated with reduced mortality and bacteremia recurrence rates.ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of infectious disease consultation for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this economic evaluation, a decision-analytic model was constructed comparing infectious disease consult with no consult. The population was adult hospital inpatients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia diagnosed with at least 1 positive blood culture. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as deaths averted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Uncertainty was addressed by plotting cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds. Costs and outcomes were calculated for a time horizon of 6 months. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective and included studies that had been published by January 2022.InterventionsPatients received or did not receive formal bedside consultation after positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were incremental difference in effectiveness (survival probabilities), incremental difference in cost (US dollars) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (US dollars/deaths averted).ResultsThis model included 1708 patients who received consultation and 1273 patients who did not. In the base-case analysis, the cost associated with the infectious disease consult strategy was $54 137.4 and the associated probability of survival was 0.77. For the no consult strategy, the cost was $57 051.2, and the probability of survival was 0.72. The incremental difference in cost between strategies was $2913.8, and the incremental difference in effectiveness was 0.05. Overall, consultation was associated with estimated savings of $55 613.4/death averted (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, −$55613.4/death averted). In the probabilistic analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000, infectious disease consult was cost-effective compared with no consult in 54% of 10 000 simulations. In cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, the consult strategy was cost-effective in 58% to 73%) of simulations compared with no consult for a willingness-to-pay threshold ranging from $0 to $150 000.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that infectious disease consultation may be a cost-effective strategy for management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and that it is associated with health care cost-savings.

Launch of Board Certification in Pediatric Infectious Diseases in Japan

“…Because the current payment system for infectious disease specialists in Japan is primarily for activities related to infection prevention and control, pediatric ID specialists must be involved in the field. Previous research found that ID specialists improved hospital finances when managing certain ID 20 by promoting careful use of antimicrobials 21 and improved patient outcomes by preventing healthcare-associated infections. To demonstrate the value of infectious disease specialists, infectious disease consultations must be reimbursed in Japan.…”