2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12962-018-0095-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Econometric estimation of WHO-CHOICE country-specific costs for inpatient and outpatient health service delivery

Abstract: BackgroundPolicy makers require information on costs related to inpatient and outpatient health services to inform resource allocation decisions.MethodsCountry data sets were gathered in 2008–2010 through literature reviews, website searches and a public call for cost data. Multivariate regression analysis was used to explore the determinants of variability in unit costs using data from 30 countries. Two models were designed, with the inpatient and outpatient models drawing upon 3407 and 9028 observations resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of in-patient days of patients with ICs but without an SSI diagnosis were the same as for those who had an SSI. If one considers total in-patient time as an indicator of in-patient cost [14], an obligatory overly fine distinction between SSI and other IC might seem less relevant. Furthermore, a significant financial impact of noninfection-related IC on healthcare cost can be assumed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of in-patient days of patients with ICs but without an SSI diagnosis were the same as for those who had an SSI. If one considers total in-patient time as an indicator of in-patient cost [14], an obligatory overly fine distinction between SSI and other IC might seem less relevant. Furthermore, a significant financial impact of noninfection-related IC on healthcare cost can be assumed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nondiabetic SARI admissions may have different characteristics (e.g., fewer co-morbidities, younger in age) that could lead to bias and limit comparisons. Another limitation is that the WHO-CHOICE estimates may underestimate indirect hospital costs [34]. A further limitation is that some of the results relied on patient or caregiver recollection, so they may not have accurately remembered or accounted for costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] The assumptions on materials used and personnel time to administer each contraceptive method were based on similar analyses in the OneHealth tool [19] and WHO-CHOICE. [20] An average cost for provision of modern contraception was calculated by applying the weighted totals from Table 1 for each contraceptive method to the associated annual cost, giving a figure of ZAR228.35 ( Table 2). The total cost of current contraceptive use was calculated as the product of the number currently using contraceptives (Table 1) and the weighted total cost (ZAR228, Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%