2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38797-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecology of Phreatophytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, our results provide further evidence that a longer distance to the groundwater results in reduced stem growth; thus, they are in accordance with the findings of several other studies on woody phreatophytes (see Thomas, 2014). The sensitive growth response of the trees in plot GD1 to changes in the water supply via the Tarim River should be taken into consideration in the future planning of water distribution on a landscape scale; the negative effects of diverting water from sites with a short distances to the water table to sites with longer distances to the groundwater might outweigh any positive effect on P. euphratica stands that are already growing at longer distances to the water table and exhibit low productivity regardless.…”
Section: Major Findings and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, our results provide further evidence that a longer distance to the groundwater results in reduced stem growth; thus, they are in accordance with the findings of several other studies on woody phreatophytes (see Thomas, 2014). The sensitive growth response of the trees in plot GD1 to changes in the water supply via the Tarim River should be taken into consideration in the future planning of water distribution on a landscape scale; the negative effects of diverting water from sites with a short distances to the water table to sites with longer distances to the groundwater might outweigh any positive effect on P. euphratica stands that are already growing at longer distances to the water table and exhibit low productivity regardless.…”
Section: Major Findings and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Under given climatic conditions, P. euphratica stand development from seedlings is only possible along rivers, in river beds, or after flooding events, when the upper soil has been thoroughly wetted and the distance to groundwater is short enough to be bridged by rapid vertical root growth (Runge, 2004;Thomas, 2014). Thereafter, the distance to the groundwater may become longer through the lowering of the water table (due to groundwater use by the human population or by natural shifts in the course of a river) or by sand accumulation.…”
Section: Major Findings and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, these practices might be a major contributor for producing a higher biomass by means of improving water availability and leading to the sequestration of carbon. However, some studies also indicated that current water diversion practices are less effective for the large-scale establishment of new seedlings and juvenile trees [20,49]. It was observed that young forests have greater annual carbon sequestration rates while mature forests store more carbon [5].…”
Section: Potential Effect Of Water Diversion Project In Relation To Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a typical phreatophyte, P. euphratica relies on permanent access to the groundwater (Wang et al, 1996;Thevs, 2005;Thomas et al, 2006;Thomas, 2014). The formation of xylem conduits with large diameters facilitates a high hydraulic conductivity (Rzepecki et al, 2011) and allows for high rates of biomass production (Gries et al, 2005;Thomas et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%