Ecology and conservation of grassy wetlands dominated by spiny mud grass Pseudoraphis spinescens in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

Abstract

1. The distribution, ecosystem functions, conservation status and threatening processes of grassy wetlands are reviewed, with an emphasis on changes in flood regimes, water resource development and land use. The focus of the review is the ecology of spiny mud grass Pseudoraphis spinescens (R.Br.) Vickery, a C 4 perennial aquatic grass.2. In Australia P. spinescens is a dominant species in grassy wetlands of the southern Murray-Darling Basin, the Wet-Dry Tropics and coastal New South Wales. Adapted to high irradiance and ambient temperatures, and to intermittent inundation for several months' duration, it is a rapidly growing (> 20 mm d -1 ), stoloniferous species, requiring prolonged, deep flooding interspersed with drying to achieve maximum growth and reproduction. Pseudoraphis spinescens can be considered an important species of grassy wetlands, providing food and habitat for waterfowl and other aquatic organisms through high primary productivity and nutrient cycling.3. Grassy wetlands in Australia are under threat from altered flood regimes, water resource development, grazing and land-use change. The provision of flood regimes that most closely match plant-specific water requirements represents the management action with the best prospect for the conservation of grassy wetlands on regulated rivers. 4. A basic model for the water regime of P. spinescens grassy wetlands is presented to inform conservation and management, and stressing the need of such wetlands for large areas and rivers with high flow volumes that generate relatively deep prolonged flooding followed by drying out of the floodplain.

How well documented is Australia's flora? Understanding spatial bias in vouchered plant specimens

“…This database is increasingly used in assessments of species distributions across geographic space and environmental gradients (Crisp et al 2001), species responses to climate change (Gallagher et al 2010;Mellick et al 2011), hotspots of invasive species (O'Donnell et al 2012;Duursma et al 2013), phytogeographical analyses (Gonz alez-Orozco et al 2014Gallagher 2016), prioritizing regions for conservation (Colloff et al 2014;Lee & Mishler 2014), and patterns of endemism and evolutionary history (Laffan & Crisp 2003;Bickford et al 2004;Rosauer et al 2009;Gonzalez-Orozco et al 2016). This database is increasingly used in assessments of species distributions across geographic space and environmental gradients (Crisp et al 2001), species responses to climate change (Gallagher et al 2010;Mellick et al 2011), hotspots of invasive species (O'Donnell et al 2012;Duursma et al 2013), phytogeographical analyses (Gonz alez-Orozco et al 2014Gallagher 2016), prioritizing regions for conservation (Colloff et al 2014;Lee & Mishler 2014), and patterns of endemism and evolutionary history (Laffan & Crisp 2003;Bickford et al 2004;Rosauer et al 2009;Gonzalez-Orozco et al 2016).…”

Quantifying water requirements of riparian river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia – implications for the management of environmental flows

“…The biota has adapted accordingly and dry periods are needed for key ecosystem processes (Colloff and Baldwin, 2010;Baldwin et al, 2013a;. Because of 50-100 years of river regulation and water resource development, flood events are now of lower volume, duration, extent and frequency (Sims et al, 2012), and many rivers and wetlands are in poor and declining condition , with negative effects on biodiversity and ecosystem function (Stokes et al, 2010;Reid et al, 2013;Colloff et al, 2014).…”

Adaptation services of floodplains and wetlands under transformational climate change

“…Aquatic grasslands are predicted to become locally extinct (Colloff et al. ). Floodplain trees are likely to be in poor condition for longer, with less regeneration.…”