2015
DOI: 10.1080/00335630.2015.1127404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecologies of Deception in Psychology and Rhetoric

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2. This is far from a novel claim in rhetorical studies, and it is not a claim I want to re-litigate here. I have previously explored the entanglement of agency, intention, and ethics in the context of the rhetorical theory’s discussion of deception (Rivers & Derksen, 2016). I want to instead explore the consensual dynamics into which this paradigm seeps and what problems is poses. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2. This is far from a novel claim in rhetorical studies, and it is not a claim I want to re-litigate here. I have previously explored the entanglement of agency, intention, and ethics in the context of the rhetorical theory’s discussion of deception (Rivers & Derksen, 2016). I want to instead explore the consensual dynamics into which this paradigm seeps and what problems is poses. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%