1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0953-7562(09)81272-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological specificity of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal associations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
67
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-occurrence of different AM fungal morphotypes has been reported several times. McGonigle & Fitter (1990) found coarse and fine endophytes in the same root system in a lowland grassland community and, in a similar habitat, Rosendahl, Rosendahl & Sochting (1990) found a similar morphological diversity. Tommerup (1988) has observed that a single 5-cm root fragment could carry up to eight different AM taxa.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Co-occurrence of different AM fungal morphotypes has been reported several times. McGonigle & Fitter (1990) found coarse and fine endophytes in the same root system in a lowland grassland community and, in a similar habitat, Rosendahl, Rosendahl & Sochting (1990) found a similar morphological diversity. Tommerup (1988) has observed that a single 5-cm root fragment could carry up to eight different AM taxa.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, Incesu et al (2015) observed rates of higher root colonizations of Diospyros virginiana with R. irregularis and G. caledonium compared with other species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (G. etunicatum, F. mosseae and G. clarium). Smith et al (2009) explained this by the capacity of a plant to develop a symbiotic association of preferential type with a species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi although it is colonized by various species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, involving different rates of colonization on roots while McGonigle and Fitter (1990) explain these differences in effect by an ecological specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As AMF, in general, are believed to colonize roots of a wide range of plants [28], the lack of functional need for mycorrhizal association in these particular edaphic conditions seems to be the reason for the absence (G. max and V. urticifolia) or low (Anchusa officinalis, Helianthus tuberosus, Linum usitatissimum) AM colonization of these species rather than the absence of AMF propagules in the soil. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence for some degree of physical and functional specificity in the symbiosis [28,[47][48][49]. Therefore, if some AMF are required for particular plant species, the lack of compatibile fungal symbionts may be the reason for the lack or lower root colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%