2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soils through direct toxicity assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been reported that physicochemical analysis such as COD and TOC alone cannot sufficiently and effectively evaluate the safety of environmental water samples (Fernandez et al, 2005). Biological toxicity tests are a useful tool for investigating the effects of all the bioavailable contaminants and their interactions, and they are widely used to evaluate the safety of environmental samples.…”
Section: Toxicity Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been reported that physicochemical analysis such as COD and TOC alone cannot sufficiently and effectively evaluate the safety of environmental water samples (Fernandez et al, 2005). Biological toxicity tests are a useful tool for investigating the effects of all the bioavailable contaminants and their interactions, and they are widely used to evaluate the safety of environmental samples.…”
Section: Toxicity Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this goal, autochthonous populations of hydrocarbon degraders can be stimulated under certain environmental conditions (temperature, soil moisture, nutrients, etc) and their success in reducing hydrocarbons contents can be evaluated through chemical analyses. However, those analyses have proven insufficient for a proper characterization of the overall soil quality because they are unable to identify all compounds in soil (Fernandez et al 2005). Moreover, they cannot detect toxic intermediary metabolites that increase soil toxicity (Haeseler et al 2001;Loibner et al 2003) nor provide information on bioavailability, synergic, and antagonistic phenomena (Juvonen et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the total concentration has been demonstrated not to be directly responsible for the exposure risk of metals to soil biota Giller et al 1998;Lofts et al 2004;Nriagu and Pacyna 1988). Thus, there is an increasing need to incorporate toxicity tests in risk assessments and the establishment of site-specific guidelines for metals in soils (Fernandez et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%