Ecological requirements of reintroduced species and the implications for release policy: the case of the bearded vulture

Abstract

Summary 1.Species undergoing reintroduction offer a unique opportunity for clarifying their specific niche requirements because they are likely, if sufficiently mobile, to colonize the most suitable habitats first. Information drawn from the individuals released first might thus be essential for optimizing species' policy as reintroductions proceed. 2. Bearded vultures were extirpated from the European Alps about a century ago. An international reintroduction programme using birds reared in captivity was launched in 1986; up to 2003, 121 individuals had been released at four different locations. Subsequent dispersion throughout the range has been far from homogeneous, resulting in a clumped occurrence of the first breeding pairs within three main zones that do not necessarily coincide with release areas. 3. In order to discern ecological requirements we performed a geographical information system (GIS) analysis of bearded vulture sightings collected in Valais (Swiss Alps) from 1987 to 2001. This area harbours no release site, is situated in the core of the Alpine range and has been visited by birds from all four release points. 4. During the prospecting phase (1987-94, mostly immature birds), the most important variable explaining bearded vulture distribution was ibex biomass. During the settling phase (1995 -2001), the presence of birds (mostly maturing subadults) correlated essentially with limestone substrates, while food abundance became secondary. 5. The selection of craggy limestone zones by maturing bearded vultures might reflect nesting sites that are well protected against adverse weather, as egg laying takes place in the winter. Limestone landscapes, in contrast to silicate substrates, also provide essential finely structured screes that are used for bone breaking and temporary food storage, particularly during chick rearing. Finally, limestone substrates provide the best thermal conditions for soaring. 6. Synthesis and applications. Extrapolated to the whole Alpine range, these findings might explain both the current distribution of the subadult/adult population and the absence of breeding records for bearded vultures around release sites in landscapes dominated by silicate substrates. As reintroduced bearded vultures tend to be philopatric, we suggest that population restoration would be more efficient if releases were concentrated within large limestone massifs. This case study of the bearded vulture illustrates the need for continual adaptive management in captive release programmes.

Underwater topography determines critical breeding habitat for humpback whales near Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica: implications for Marine Protected Areas

“…Hence an M (Marginality) value closer to one expresses a distribution of values associated with a particular environmental factor and separate from the global conditions. Following Hirzel et al (2004) suggestion, to ease the interpretation of specialization, the Tolerance (Tol) coefficient; which is the inverse of the specialization, is given as it is an indicator of the species' niche breadth. Before calculating the indices, according with the bi-modal distribution of depths in the study area (Figure 2), it was stratified into shelf waters and transition-off shore waters.…”

Species Distribution Models Do Not Account for Abundance: The Case of Arthropods on Terceira Island

“…By quantifying species-environment relationships and prediction of species' geographic distributions from confirmed occurrences, they assume a direct link between the probability of presence and environmental suitability (Pearce & Ferrier 2001, Peterson 2006. Such models can be used to develop management decisions and conservation strategies (Schadt et al 2002, Barbosa et al 2003, Hirzel et al 2004, Russell et al 2004, among other practical and theoretical applications (see Peterson 2006 for a review). Their usefulness would be greatly strengthened if a relationship between local probability of occurrence and abundance were to exist.…”

A synecological framework for systematic conservation planning

“…Whilst one group of predictive methods try to model present-day spatial probabilities of occurrence (environmental conditions occupied by the species), others estimate habitat suitability for each species (potentially suitable environmental conditions; see Peterson et al 1999). In single-species conservation planning, the latter are also useful for monitoring and re-introduction tasks (see Hirzel 2001;Hirzel et al 2001Hirzel et al , 2002Hirzel et al , 2004Chefaoui et al 2005;Cassinello et al in press). Lehmann et al (2002a) favored the use of niche-based models for conservation purposes, but theoretical models may not work in real scenarios.…”