2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological relevance of current water quality assessment unit designations in impaired rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes decision-making approaches are needed to assess the quality of water. Different water quality approaches such as Fuzzy logic [6], Regression Analysis [4], Weighted Athematic [3], Ordered weighted Averaging and TOPSIS [1], Multivariate Analysis [7], Spearmen's rank correlation [8] and neural networks [9] are exercised in making the decision on quality of water. But monograph-based techniques like Wilcox's [10] and Richards's [11] and Doneen's [12] approach are easy to adopt and implement for management and policy development purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes decision-making approaches are needed to assess the quality of water. Different water quality approaches such as Fuzzy logic [6], Regression Analysis [4], Weighted Athematic [3], Ordered weighted Averaging and TOPSIS [1], Multivariate Analysis [7], Spearmen's rank correlation [8] and neural networks [9] are exercised in making the decision on quality of water. But monograph-based techniques like Wilcox's [10] and Richards's [11] and Doneen's [12] approach are easy to adopt and implement for management and policy development purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%