Ecological niche differentiation and taxonomic distinction between Eremias strauchi strauchi and Eremias strauchi kopetdaghica (Squamata: Lacertidae) on the Iranian Plateau based on ecological niche modeling

Abstract

Eremias strauchi strauchi and Eremias strauchi kopetdaghica are genetically and morphologically distinct and are distributed allopatrically in northeastern and northwestern Iran. E. s. strauchi is distinguishable by having green spots on lateral parts of the body, while E. s. kopetdaghica is characterized by white spots and irregular black dots on lateral parts of the body. Recent molecular studies have suggested that these are two distinct species, but other types of analyses leave their classification unclear. In this study, we evaluated their taxonomic status using additional data (including ecological niches) to confirm the hypothesis that they are two species. All known records of their occurrence were employed to predict and evaluate the suitable areas where they may be expected to be found in Iran. We then performed niche similarity tests (niche identity and background tests) and point-based analyses to compare their ecological niches and explain ecological differentiation. Niche models of E. s. strauchi and E. s. kopetdaghica had good results and powerful performance based on high area under the curve (AUC) values [E. s. strauchi = 0.992, standard deviation (SD) = ± 0.008; E. s. kopetdaghica = 0.978, SD = ± 0.032]. Ecological differentiation has been found across the entire range, indicating that ecological differentiation had an important role in species differentiation. Environmental conditions for the species diverged along environmental variables, as precipitation of coldest quarter for the "Strauch" subspecies and precipitation of warmest quarter for the "Kopet dagh" subspecies were most important in determining habitat suitability, respectively. These two factors are important in niche differentiation between the two species and influenced their genetic divergence. Finally, our results confirmed the niche differentiation between E. s. strauchi and E. s. kopetdaghica and added new insights into the taxonomic distinction between E. s. strauchi and E. s. kopetdaghica.

Pliocene–Pleistocene ecological niche evolution shapes the phylogeography of a Mediterranean plant group

“…mauritanica inhabits more Mediterranean conditions (Figure 5b). This suggests that ecological constraints acting upon populations do not depend so much on the species intrinsic characteristics, but on the local conditions of the geographic region where they are distributed (Boucher-Lalonde, Morin, & Currie, 2016), which in turn promote the geographic isolation and the subsequent genetic structure (Cavender-Bares & Pahlich, 2009;Hosseinian Yousefkhani, Rastegar-Pouyani, & Aliabadian, 2016). The presence of geographical barriers that limited expansion (Wiens, 2004a), as well as microhabitat preferences (Thompson, 2005) may have also played a role.…”

An integrative approach uncovered variation within Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier, 1804) (Squamata: Agamidae) in Western Asia

“…Western Asia was influenced by different geological events, with the main event being the collision between the Arabian and Eurasian tectonic plates (Alaee, 2009). From these events, TA B L E 1 Descriptive statistics of all examined characters for male specimens of Trapelus ruderatus in this study These mountains directly influenced the development of different climatic conditions and act as natural barriers and corridors for lizards (Ahmadzadeh et al, 2013;Gül, 2013;Hosseinian Yousefkhani et al, 2016;Kapli et al, 2013;Smidt & Frynta, 2012). The Anatolian diagonal is the key geological structure for understanding the phylogeography of many vertebrate taxa, especially reptiles (Jablonski et al, 2019;Kapli et al, 2013;Kornilios et al, 2012).…”

The Potential Distribution and Westernmost Record of Eremias strauchi Kessler, 1878 in Turkey

“…Türler, yayılışlarını belirlemek için biyotik (rakip veya öngörücüler gibi) ve abiyotik (çevresel faktörler veya mikro habitat yapıları gibi) faktörlerin de dâhil olduğu birçok değişkenden etkilenmektedirler (Hosseinian Yousefkhani, Rastegar-Pouyani, & Aliabadian, 2016). İklim değişkenleri de türlerin dağılımını sınırlandıran en önemli faktörlerdendir (Cahill et al, 2013).…”