2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vmr8q
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance across Research Fields

Abstract: Ecological Momentary Assessments (i.e., EMA, repeated assessments in daily life) are widespread in many fields of psychology and related disciplines. Yet, little knowledge exists on how differences in study designs and samples predict study compliance and dropout—two central parameters of data quality in (micro-)longitudinal research. The current meta-analysis included k = 477 articles (496 samples, total N = 677,536). For each article, we coded the design, sample characteristics, compliance, and dropout rate.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This development would be hard to account for with typical VAR models. Beyond the issue of stationarity, experience sampling studies commonly follow individuals for a short time, often around one or two weeks (Wrzus & Neubauer, 2021), and might thus miss slow changes developing over a longer time frame. We aim to investigate the possibilities of circumventing these limitations by using recently developed methods for the estimation of time-varying models for psychological applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development would be hard to account for with typical VAR models. Beyond the issue of stationarity, experience sampling studies commonly follow individuals for a short time, often around one or two weeks (Wrzus & Neubauer, 2021), and might thus miss slow changes developing over a longer time frame. We aim to investigate the possibilities of circumventing these limitations by using recently developed methods for the estimation of time-varying models for psychological applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software was designed for multi-platform compatibility, which allows for automated notifications for participants using a quasi-random temporal sampling structure (participants were randomly prompted six times between 8:00 and 22:00). The duration and number of survey notifications followed similar designs to previous research ( 24 , 27 , 42 ). Participants were given a 30-min window to respond to each survey notification, this was to ensure that participants gave in-the-moment responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because there is no empirical evidence to support considerations key to the design of EMA studies, decisions are typically made on an ad-hoc and expedient basis such as regarding the perceived feasibility or following decisions made in prior research, with unclear validity and generalizability (Janssens et al, 2018). Relatedly, meta-analytic work has mostly focused on compliance rates (Wrzus & Neubauer, 2022).…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%