1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.07105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Genetics and the Restoration of Plant Communities: Mix or Match?

Abstract: We present a conceptual framework for choosing native plant material to be used in restoration projects on the basis of ecological genetics. We evaluate both the likelihood of rapid establishment of plants and the probability of long‐term persistence of restored or later successional communities. In addition, we consider the possible harmful effects of restoration projects on nearby ecosystems and their native resident populations. Two attributes of the site to be restored play an important role in determining… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
281
4
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
5
281
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of native genotypes in restoration is important in the avoidance of outbreeding depression, which can result in the decline of a native population (Erickson, 2008;Aitken and Whitlock, 2013). Local ecotypes are adapted to site conditions, and even though the use of natives is often more expensive there is greater restoration success with their use (Lesica and Allendorf, 1999). However, there have been recent recommendations that local genotypes could be supplemented with non-local genotypes as bet-hedging against unforeseen environmental change (Doak and Morris, 2010).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of native genotypes in restoration is important in the avoidance of outbreeding depression, which can result in the decline of a native population (Erickson, 2008;Aitken and Whitlock, 2013). Local ecotypes are adapted to site conditions, and even though the use of natives is often more expensive there is greater restoration success with their use (Lesica and Allendorf, 1999). However, there have been recent recommendations that local genotypes could be supplemented with non-local genotypes as bet-hedging against unforeseen environmental change (Doak and Morris, 2010).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of non-timber native plants (grasses, forbs, and shrubs) in restoration and reclamation is increasing, with some concern that seed transfer guidelines of some kind may be needed (Lesica and Allendorf 1999;Booth and Jones 2001;Hufford and Mazer 2003). This concern is reasonable because, in addition to forest trees, both agronomic crops and orna-T mental releases have recommended limits for their distribution.…”
Section: N O M E N C L At U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to concerns about the loss of local adaptation and reduced progeny fitness through outbreeding depression [6][7][8], recommendations for sourcing genetic material for genetic rescue and restoration often advocate the use of local genotypes, genetically similar individuals or those from environments that match the transplant site [4,[8][9][10][11]. Although these recommendations provide an important basis undertaking genetic rescue, there is currently little known about the relative contribution of genetic quality to restoration success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%