The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological effects of clearcutting practices in a boreal forest (Arkhangelsk Region, Russian Federation) both with and without FSC certification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the boreal biome, natural configuration of forest landscapes are seriously transformed by rotation forestry systems that, amongst other impacts, interrupt spatial connectivity and temporal continuity of forest cover (e.g., Boucher et al 2009;Svensson et al 2018). Given the circumpolar range, large area and rich ecological values in the boreal biome (e.g., Moen et al 2014) this transformation profoundly impacts a globally important biodiversity and ecosystem services source, disturbs ecosystem resilience to climate and land use changes (Mantyka-Pringle et al 2012;Blumroeder et al 2019), and contests sustainability-and conservation-oriented policies and environmental targets (Sverdrup-Thygesson et al 2014;Chazdon et al 2016;IPBES 2018;Angelstam et al 2020). In combination with climate change, intensive forestry and other drivers of ecosystem change, a sledgehammer effect is foreseen where boreal ecosystems as well as ecosystems in other biogeographic regions are at risk of entering new and potentially irreversible ecological states (Barnosky et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the boreal biome, natural configuration of forest landscapes are seriously transformed by rotation forestry systems that, amongst other impacts, interrupt spatial connectivity and temporal continuity of forest cover (e.g., Boucher et al 2009;Svensson et al 2018). Given the circumpolar range, large area and rich ecological values in the boreal biome (e.g., Moen et al 2014) this transformation profoundly impacts a globally important biodiversity and ecosystem services source, disturbs ecosystem resilience to climate and land use changes (Mantyka-Pringle et al 2012;Blumroeder et al 2019), and contests sustainability-and conservation-oriented policies and environmental targets (Sverdrup-Thygesson et al 2014;Chazdon et al 2016;IPBES 2018;Angelstam et al 2020). In combination with climate change, intensive forestry and other drivers of ecosystem change, a sledgehammer effect is foreseen where boreal ecosystems as well as ecosystems in other biogeographic regions are at risk of entering new and potentially irreversible ecological states (Barnosky et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a generic assumption is that such forests maintain, or potentially maintain, forest and forest landscape attributes that are lost or disturbed by extensive clearcutting practices elsewhere in the landscape (cf. Curtis et al 2018;Blumroeder et al 2019). Our study covered a 22.2 million ha forest-dominated region, pre-dominantly with extensive rotation forestry impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of tree harvesting on forest ecosystems generally differ markedly from those of natural disturbances, and these impacts significantly alter the characteristics of landscapes and stands in managed areas, for example, by 2 of 18 rejuvenating or fragmenting these stands [3][4][5]. Such changes can threaten biodiversity [6][7][8] and the provision of ecosystem services in these forests [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest microclimate regulation can be used as a proxy indicator for forest functionality (Chen et al, 1999) and ecological effects of forest management and forest certification (Blumroeder et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%