2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological-economic assessment of ecological sanitation development in the cities of Chinese Loess Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nutrient emissions from the air tight reactors are considered negligible (Bluteau et al, 2009). Nutrient emission rates of the organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer after farmland application are shown in Table 2 (Yan et al, 2003) 0.116 (Ju et al, 2009) N N 2 O-N Air 0.005 (Zhou et al, 2010) 0.0104 (Yan et al, 2003) N NOx-N Air 0.002 (Thibodeau et al, 2014a) 0.0034 (Liu et al, 2013) N b NO 3 --N Soil 0.0001 (Ti, 2011) 0.003 (Ju et al, 2009) N c NH 4 + -N River 0.021 (Zhao, 2009) 0.05 (Zhu, 2008…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and The Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nutrient emissions from the air tight reactors are considered negligible (Bluteau et al, 2009). Nutrient emission rates of the organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer after farmland application are shown in Table 2 (Yan et al, 2003) 0.116 (Ju et al, 2009) N N 2 O-N Air 0.005 (Zhou et al, 2010) 0.0104 (Yan et al, 2003) N NOx-N Air 0.002 (Thibodeau et al, 2014a) 0.0034 (Liu et al, 2013) N b NO 3 --N Soil 0.0001 (Ti, 2011) 0.003 (Ju et al, 2009) N c NH 4 + -N River 0.021 (Zhao, 2009) 0.05 (Zhu, 2008…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment and The Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanitation 2.0 is expected to sanitize urine and feces, recover nutrients for food production, and prevent environmental pollutions while minimizing the demand on other resources (Zhou et al, 2010). With the efforts and cooperations of scientists, engineers and social activists, the San-2 has obtained so abundant achievements in R&Ds and worldwide demonstrative applications (Greg, 2012;Langergraber et al, 2005;Zhou et al, 2010). However, the dictatorship of Con-San in real application market is as firm as before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many interventions have been sought in the past to address the human health and aquatic life implications associated with poor solid waste management (SWM) practices. Majority of such interventions however have failed to recognise that human health risks and threats to aquatic life associated with poor SWM practices are to a large extent moderated by unique characteristics of different urban and rural spaces where such waste is generated (Zhou et al 2010). More often, they have failed to employ multiple criteria-based evaluation models that depict complex and interrelated criteria usually associated with municipal solid waste management (MSWM) (Liao & Chiu 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More often, they have failed to employ multiple criteria-based evaluation models that depict complex and interrelated criteria usually associated with municipal solid waste management (MSWM) (Liao & Chiu 2011). Most studies on MSWM have characterised waste management as a quasi-linear process that more often than not fails to depict important SWM interrelationships that hold the key to developing effective waste management strategies (see Xu et al 2003; Zhou et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material flow analysis (MFA) or substance flow analysis (SFA) are suitable methodologies for this purpose. The application of the MFA to sanitation systems has been attempted in several studies, some of which considered sanitation systems as a part of material flows [7,8], and some of which focused mainly on sanitation system [9,10]. However these studies describe current material flows and only providing the conceptual description of possible improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%