2014
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological consequences of amphibian larvae and their native and alien predators on the community structure of temporary ponds

Abstract: Summary Connections between consumers and resources in food webs are complex and affect the structure and functioning of ecosystems. We assessed the influence of amphibians as consumers on the structure and functioning of temporary ponds, determining their impact on macrophyte abundance, zooplankton diversity and water chemistry. The effect of amphibians may be modulated by interactions with predators or competitors that alter tadpole density or behaviour. Therefore, we also investigated the consumptive and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Arribas et al. ). It is often assumed that prey naiveté largely explains the success of IAP and their harmful ecological impacts, but this idea has only recently become the focus of empirical research (Cox and Lima , Paolucci et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Arribas et al. ). It is often assumed that prey naiveté largely explains the success of IAP and their harmful ecological impacts, but this idea has only recently become the focus of empirical research (Cox and Lima , Paolucci et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "enemy release hypothesis" suggests that after invading a new environment, IAS escape many of their parasites, predators, and competitors (Keane and Crawley 2002). The "prey naiveté hypothesis" suggests that invasive alien predators (IAP) may not be recognized as enemies by native prey, or that effective antipredator responses may be absent (Cox andLima 2006, Banks andDickman 2007), resulting in greater hunting efficiency of predators (Kiesecker andBlaustein 1997, Gomez-Mestre andDíaz-Paniagua 2011), and potentially devastating effects for prey populations (Cruz et al 2006, Arribas et al 2014. It is often assumed that prey naiveté largely explains the success of IAP and their harmful ecological impacts, but this idea has only recently become the focus of empirical research (Cox andLima 2006, Paolucci et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition and predation are two key factors influencing the structure and dynamics of ecological communities (Paine, 1966;Vellend, 2010;Arribas et al, 2014). These two factors often occur at the same time and the mere presence of predators or competitors, in addition to their density-dependent effects on prey, may force organisms with phenotypic plasticity to shift aspects of their phenotype (e.g., behavior, feeding structures, metabolism) thereby altering the realized trophic niche of the species (Levin, 2009;Caut et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the trophic status of species and communities is recognized as crucial to understanding energy flow, nutrient cycling, species coexistence and community assembly (Pimm, 1982;Pascual and Dunne, 2005), we have relatively little information on how different members of a guild might alter their feeding niche when subjected to predation and competition. Therefore, direct assessments of trophic interactions are needed to better understand community composition and shed light on the complex relationships between competition and predation that arise as different species are involved (Arribas et al, 2014(Arribas et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When prey is not adapted to respond to hunting tactics of a new predator or even to recognize it as a threat, hunting efficiency of predators may dramatically increase and prey populations may suffer potentially devastating effects (Cruz et al 2006, GomezMestre and Díaz-Paniagua 2011, Arribas et al 2014. Predator species recovered because of management actions or reintroduction projects might affect local prey populations in a similar way as an alien predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%