2010
DOI: 10.2965/jwet.2010.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Assessment of Water Quality by Three-species Acute Toxicity Test and GC/MS Analysis - A Case Study of Agricultural Drains -

Abstract: The water quality of environmental waters from the viewpoint of aquatic ecotoxicity was investigated using a three-species ecotoxicity test (algae, daphnia and fish). Water samples were collected, concentrated with a solid-phase extraction technique and exposed to each test species. The growth inhibition, immobilization (swimming inhibition) and mortality ratios in acute toxicity tests for algae, daphnia and fish, respectively, were used as water quality indexes. For the river waters, 38% of the monitoring sit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrogen purge procedure at the default condition Nitrogen purge of acetone solution, which had been used as the extraction solvent in SPE (Ishi et al, 2000;Fattahia et al, 2007;Jinya et al, 2011;Samadia et al, 2012), was investigated in this study. Fundamentals of the nitrogen purge procedure were according to the conventional method (Jinya et al, 2011;Kameya et al, 2010;Kameya et al, 2012). The 10 mL acetone extract was put into a test tube, and purged to 0.5 mL moderately at a gas flow of 0.5 mL/min from about 1 cm above the solvent surface constantly by adjusting the height of purging nozzle.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus Of Nitrogen Gas Purgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nitrogen purge procedure at the default condition Nitrogen purge of acetone solution, which had been used as the extraction solvent in SPE (Ishi et al, 2000;Fattahia et al, 2007;Jinya et al, 2011;Samadia et al, 2012), was investigated in this study. Fundamentals of the nitrogen purge procedure were according to the conventional method (Jinya et al, 2011;Kameya et al, 2010;Kameya et al, 2012). The 10 mL acetone extract was put into a test tube, and purged to 0.5 mL moderately at a gas flow of 0.5 mL/min from about 1 cm above the solvent surface constantly by adjusting the height of purging nozzle.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus Of Nitrogen Gas Purgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including the Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) system, the promotion of chemical management is required internationally, and the need for environmental risk evaluation of chemicals has increased in recent years. Therefore, environmental monitoring of chemicals has become important for the evaluation of risk to humans and aquatic life, and effective simultaneous monitoring of large number of chemicals in the environment is necessary (Kadokami et al, 2009;Kameya et al, 2010;Miyagawa et al, 2011;Kondo et al, 2012;Kadokami et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the SPE, nitrogen gas purge procedure and recovery ratio followed the conventional method (Kameya et al, 2010;Jinya et al, 2011;Kameya et al, 2012;Jinya, 2012;Kameya et al, 2014). In a previous laboratory experiment, more than 80% of chemicals examined had a recovery ratio of 50 -140%.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%