Current Ornithology, Volume 16 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1211-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Aspects of Neophobia and neophilia in birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
447
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
14
447
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also accept a broader range of foodstuffs, including more food of animal origin (Madge & Burn 1994). We might, thus, predict that scrub-jays would show superiority in cognitive tests related to ecological generality, such as exploratory behavior (Haemig 1989), environmental sampling (Shettleworth et al 1988), or neophobia (Greenberg 1984(Greenberg , 1990). Clayton's ) studies of episodic memory in scrub-jays also suggest that their generalist ecology may require them to encode more information about particular food-related events than a specialist species such as a pinyon jay or nutcracker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also accept a broader range of foodstuffs, including more food of animal origin (Madge & Burn 1994). We might, thus, predict that scrub-jays would show superiority in cognitive tests related to ecological generality, such as exploratory behavior (Haemig 1989), environmental sampling (Shettleworth et al 1988), or neophobia (Greenberg 1984(Greenberg , 1990). Clayton's ) studies of episodic memory in scrub-jays also suggest that their generalist ecology may require them to encode more information about particular food-related events than a specialist species such as a pinyon jay or nutcracker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…predators, challenging microclimates). However, when familiar resources are available, exploration might have a reduced benefit and be lost through genetic drift [17]; further, in these areas, exploration might increase the likelihood of exposure to toxins and predators, waste time that could be devoted to other activities [18], and increase the likelihood of being out-competed by individuals procuring known resources. Indeed, exploration tends to be stronger in invasive species and invading populations [7,19,20] compared with native species and populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to solve such problems, e.g., by innovating novel behaviors or using existing behavior in a novel way, may thus be an important determinant of adaptability, especially in generalist species (7)(8)(9) or populations colonizing new habitats (10,11). When facing novel tasks, group members might be at an advantage compared with solitary individuals: they may cooperate to solve the problem (12,13), or in uncooperative situations they may use the solutions invented by members of their group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%