1978
DOI: 10.1093/icb/18.4.715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological and Evolutionary Implications of Bird Pollination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
122
0
6

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
122
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Small, short-billed hummingbirds also defended the flowers. Besides nectar characteristics of E. speciosa, the massive flowering and the proximity of individuals in the studied population enhance the amount of nectar available in a limited space, favoring the establishment of feeding territories (STILES 1978, SAZIMA et al 1996.…”
Section: Assemblage Of Bird Visitors and Visitation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small, short-billed hummingbirds also defended the flowers. Besides nectar characteristics of E. speciosa, the massive flowering and the proximity of individuals in the studied population enhance the amount of nectar available in a limited space, favoring the establishment of feeding territories (STILES 1978, SAZIMA et al 1996.…”
Section: Assemblage Of Bird Visitors and Visitation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was statistically lower than by T. glaucopis and C. rubricauda; the former species were expelled from the feeders by the latter dominant species, therefore feeding less in the artificial patches. Dominant species limit the access of subordinate species to food sources (Stiles 1978, Roussau et al 2014) when defending a territory, but only if the energy gain is higher than the energy loss (Heinrich 1975). The artificial food patches created in this study, especially those with 35% sugar concentration, had enough energy to warrant the expression of territorial behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Three behavioral strategies can be adopted by hummingbirds when foraging: (A) dominance/territoriality, when an individual defends a territory containing food resources and excludes competitors from the resource (Feisinger 1976, Feisinger and Colwell 1978, Stiles 1978, Cotton 1998, and (B) intruder/ subordinance, when an individual forages in defended patches until it is expelled by the territorial hummingbird (Feisinger and Colwell 1978, Stiles 1978, Barbosa-Filho and Araújo 2013. A third strategy is known as trapline foraging (C), when an individual repeatedly visits a set of plants in routes through different patches, exploiting resources without displaying any territorial behavior (Feisinger and Colwell 1978, Rios et al 2010, Tello-Ramos et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds may, therefore, be important supplemental pollinators in environments where insects have low population densities, such as high-altitude ecosystems (Van der Pijl and Dodson 1966), isolated islands where insect colonization has been poor (Micheneau et al 2006), and dry environments (Stiles 1978). Nevertheless, compared with tropical and subtropical regions, where bird pollination is particularly common (Willmer 2011), cold, hyper-arid, and nutrient-poor environments have relatively few bird-pollinated plants (Cronk and Ojeda 2008).…”
Section: I�����������mentioning
confidence: 99%