2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04791-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological and economic growth interdependency in the Asian economies: an empirical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on evidence from Pakistan, Hassan et al (2019) examined the influence of per capita real natural resources on environmental degradation and confirmed the contribution of per capita real natural resources to environmental degradation. Similarly, Uddin et al (2019) studied the association between real income and ecological footprints for 14 Asian countries and they confirmed the presence of quadratic relation between environmental degradation and real income in Pakistan, Nepal, India and Malaysia. Desktek and Sarkodie (2019) concluded the existence of two-way causal relationship between real income and ecological footprints for 11 newly industrialized countries (NICs).…”
Section: An Empirical Analysis Of Dynamic Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Depending on evidence from Pakistan, Hassan et al (2019) examined the influence of per capita real natural resources on environmental degradation and confirmed the contribution of per capita real natural resources to environmental degradation. Similarly, Uddin et al (2019) studied the association between real income and ecological footprints for 14 Asian countries and they confirmed the presence of quadratic relation between environmental degradation and real income in Pakistan, Nepal, India and Malaysia. Desktek and Sarkodie (2019) concluded the existence of two-way causal relationship between real income and ecological footprints for 11 newly industrialized countries (NICs).…”
Section: An Empirical Analysis Of Dynamic Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It can provide the needed infrastructures, reduce poverty, and improve people's living standard. On the flip side, it has its downsides, especially when an economy pays less attention to its natural environment while intensifying its desire for affluence (Meo et al, 2020a(Meo et al, , 2020bAhmed et al, 2019aAhmed et al, , 2019bNathaniel, 2019;Uddin et al, 2019;Omojolaibi and Nathaniel, 2020). In Africa, South Africa is arguably the most developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change lowers profitability and reduces investment probability and resulting in cutting output in the short and long runs: On the one hand, deficient demand brings employment falling in short run; on the other hand, productivity growth becomes slower, such lowering the potential income in the long run (Rezai et al, 2018). In many countries, such as in China, reducing carbon emissions is quite difficulty since it will handicap China's economic growth, and will not decrease carbon emissions in a long period (Wang et al, 2011); while for 14 Asian countries, the natural environment will become a victim of increased economic growth (Uddin, Alam, & Gow, 2019). Despite that, not many of them have taken adequate measures to increase their capacity of bioproductive or to reduce their energy inefficient until now (Uddin et al, 2019); however, efficiency is crucial and many scholars estimate energy efficiency (Song & Li, 2019); similarly, during the period of 1995-2013, for the 12 transition economies with high income, the economic growth has increased the energy consumption, while for the countries with low income, the former has reduced the latter (Pablo-Romero, Sa´nchez-Braza, & Anna, 2019); even some scholars have also assessed the cost of ecological losses: The economic losses of ecological cost is $2,076/person in South Korean during 1980-2000 (Lee & Kim, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries, such as in China, reducing carbon emissions is quite difficulty since it will handicap China's economic growth, and will not decrease carbon emissions in a long period (Wang et al, 2011); while for 14 Asian countries, the natural environment will become a victim of increased economic growth (Uddin, Alam, & Gow, 2019). Despite that, not many of them have taken adequate measures to increase their capacity of bioproductive or to reduce their energy inefficient until now (Uddin et al, 2019); however, efficiency is crucial and many scholars estimate energy efficiency (Song & Li, 2019); similarly, during the period of 1995-2013, for the 12 transition economies with high income, the economic growth has increased the energy consumption, while for the countries with low income, the former has reduced the latter (Pablo-Romero, Sa´nchez-Braza, & Anna, 2019); even some scholars have also assessed the cost of ecological losses: The economic losses of ecological cost is $2,076/person in South Korean during 1980-2000 (Lee & Kim, 2018). We should realize that we must pay attention to the use of ecological characteristics, which are completely different from those of artificial resources, if we expect the quality of life to be sustained.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%