Ecologías De Aprendizaje en Plataformas Online Especializadas:

Roda-Segarra, Jacobo; Mengual-Andrés, Santiago

doi:10.2307/j.ctv2zp4tn1.8

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The high proportion of research originating from China is notable, particularly in comparison to the next country in terms of affiliations, aligning with findings from other studies related to AI and education. For instance, Roda-Segarra et al (2024) identified 20% of authors affiliated with institutions in China in a study examining the use of AI for predicting school dropout rates.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of social metrics on scientific production in the field of emotion-aware education through artificial intelligence

Roda-Segarra,

Mengual-Andrés,

Payà Rico

2024

Front. Artif. Intell.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research in the field of Artificial Intelligence applied to emotions in the educational context has experienced significant growth in recent years. However, despite the field’s profound implications for the educational community, the social impact of this scientific production on digital social media remains unclear. To address this question, the present research has been proposed, aiming to analyze the social impact of scientific production on the use of Artificial Intelligence for emotions in the educational context. For this purpose, a sample of 243 scientific publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science has been selected, from which a second sample of 6,094 social impact records has been extracted from Altmetric, Crossref, and PlumX databases. A dual analysis has been conducted using specially designed software: on one hand, the scientific sample has been analyzed from a bibliometric perspective, and on the other hand, the social impact records have been studied. Comparative analysis based on the two dimensions, scientific and social, has focused on the evolution of scientific production with its corresponding social impact, sources, impact, and content analysis. The results indicate that scientific publications have had a high social impact (with an average of 25.08 social impact records per publication), with a significant increase in research interest starting from 2019, likely driven by the emotional implications of measures taken to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, a lack of alignment has been identified between articles with the highest scientific impact and those with the highest social impact, as well as a lack of alignment in the most commonly used terms from both scientific and social perspectives, a significant variability in the lag in months for scientific research to make an impact on social media, and the fact that the social impact of the research did not emerge from the interest of Twitter users unaffiliated with the research, but rather from the authors, publishers, or scientific institutions. The proposed comparative methodology can be applied to any field of study, making it a useful tool given that current trends in accreditation agencies propose the analysis of the repercussion of scientific research in social media.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%