Ecoinformatics (Big Data) for Agricultural Entomology: Pitfalls, Progress, and Promise

Abstract

Ecoinformatics, as defined in this review, is the use of preexisting data sets to address questions in ecology. We provide the first review of ecoinformatics methods in agricultural entomology. Ecoinformatics methods have been used to address the full range of questions studied by agricultural entomologists, enabled by the special opportunities associated with data sets, nearly all of which have been observational, that are larger and more diverse and that embrace larger spatial and temporal scales than most experimental studies do. We argue that ecoinformatics research methods and traditional, experimental research methods have strengths and weaknesses that are largely complementary. We address the important interpretational challenges associated with observational data sets, highlight common pitfalls, and propose some best practices for researchers using these methods. Ecoinformatics methods hold great promise as a vehicle for capitalizing on the explosion of data emanating from farmers, researchers, and the public, as novel sampling and sensing techniques are developed and digital data sharing becomes more widespread.

The Increasing Disconnection of Primary Biodiversity Data from Specimens: How Does It Happen and How to Handle It?

“…In both cases, this situation offers new opportunities that will enrich our understanding of biodiversity and generate a higher awareness of conservation issues or of biodiversity shortfalls (Hortal et al 2015). Other benefits followed such as an increased power in statistical analyses because of larger datasets or the possibility to tackle issues at large taxonomical, temporal or spatial scales (Rosenheim and Gratton 2017). However, the large volume of data is also a curation challenge that must be handled to avoid passing on a dubious source of knowledge to future generations because of a fall in data quality (Howe et al 2008), a criticism regularly brought up for GBIF mediated data (e.g.…”

Measuring What Matters: Actionable Information for Conservation Biocontrol in Multifunctional Landscapes

“…These include the USDA's own Risk Management Agency's "Cause of Loss" dataset that identifies when pest outbreaks were severe enough to trigger crop insurance claims (USDA RMA, 2018), as well as several massive datasets on pest abundance and damage gathered by the Ministries of Agriculture in China (Lu et al, 2010(Lu et al, , 2012Zhang et al, 2018) and Spain (Paredes et al, 2015). New ecoinformatic approaches are being developed to analyze such datasets (Rosenheim and Gratton, 2017). Long-term spatial informatics will be a key research frontier to secure more reliable pest control services and more sustainable pest management for agriculture.…”

Sowing the seeds for interdisciplinary plant research and development in the Tropical Andes

“…The main lines of research of the platform fit broadly under four themes: (i) the characterization of cultivated and wild biodiversity; (ii) the study of biological interactions; (iii) the study of ecosystem services and nature‐based solutions; and (iv) the development of tools and training (as an intersecting task, see Figure and legend for details). While plant biodiversity and agronomical research are typically considered distant, or even conflicting, fields of research, they are now converging through the use of common approaches, in particular through ʼomics, pattern recognition techniques and platforms that provide increasingly high volumes of species and environmental data (e.g., Rosenheim & Gratton, , Wolfert, Ge, Verdouw, & Bogaardt, ). A key aspiration of the platform is to support projects that engage communities, businesses, and policymakers (e.g., governmental institutions) so that academic knowledge can be transformed into application‐driven science, with up‐scaling potential, and socioeconomic relevance.…”